--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Xenophaneros Anartaxius" 
<anartaxius@...> wrote:
>
> I suppose I ought respond to a few of these comments. Perhaps Xeno has taken 
> leave of his senses.
> 
> > awoelflebater wrotes:
> 
> > So Xeno writes the other day to Judy:
> 
> > "I feel Barry is more spiritually advanced than Robin"
> 
> > This alone made my head spin. But just, for example, take a look at Robin's 
> > commentary to Emily after she took his quiz yesterday (post 317866) and 
> > explain to me how you could possibly argue for this point Xeno. What 
> > exactly is your definition of spiritual? Maybe it is something I don't want 
> > to aspire to or can view as a positive thing if that is your assessment. If 
> > spirituality has anything whatsoever to the quality of heart, openness, 
> > willingness to understand, desire to be transformed by truth and life, 
> > sensitivity to other living creatures then, dear Xeno, I think you have 
> > miscalculated badly - your assertion has missed the mark.
> 
> > Emily wrote:
> > I found that an interesting statement, to say the least.
> 
> > raunchydog wrote:
> > I'd missed this one, Em. What a hoot!
> 
> > Ravi wrote:
> >
> > ...I think Xeno, the frozen, immobile, sitting duck with his neo-advaita 
> > platitudes, the one who used to serve as a target practice for me to whup 
> > his ass any time, at my will, at my fancy, has finally stepped up the ante 
> > to fill the huge, gaping, void left by His Holiness...
> 
> > ...This cold, heartless one has been brutally stung by my ambushes. And 
> > this ultimately is a victory for me!!! 
> 
> (Your ambushes, Ravi are particularly inept and unfocused and largely 
> self-congratulatory. But then that is Ravi!)
> 
> > ...Glory to Xeno - the Maitreya of Morons !!!
> 
> > salyavin808 wrote:
> > I guess it boils down to that most curious trait that makes people in the 
> > TMO (and perhaps other groups) ascribe enlightenment to people simply 
> > because they like them.
> 
> First of all, I said 'I thought', meaning that is my opinion; I did not 
> ascribe enlightenment either to Robin or Barry. I said 'more spiritually 
> advanced'. That implies some relative difference in what I consider a 
> person's understanding of spirituality, but it does not imply what that value 
> of advancement is, other than I thought there was a difference. It does not 
> imply how much the degree of separation is either. Emily was kind enough to 
> quote a few comments I made as reasons for the choice I made. 
> 
> It is based more on a feeling than anything else. If I had to trust someone 
> to watch my back, I would pick Barry over Robin. Fewer blades, and were one 
> to fly, Barry would be up front about it. I do not trust Robin. For whatever 
> problems, shortcomings, and curmudgeonly gripes Barry may have, he is far 
> more direct than Robin, Barry is calculating in many ways, to my mind, but 
> Robin is cunning, and that is danger. Further Robin has a history that is 
> less than savoury in his interactions with people. I do not know Barry's, but 
> based on the interactions here, my guess with normal people (that is, not 
> us), he is a regular guy, maybe a little crusty, but essentially normal. Here 
> on FFL, our IDs (the monsters of the ID) are not so restrained. Robin's does 
> not appear to have been much restrained. People who have the experience of 
> slipping into unity or Brahman, to use that term, seldom take and run with 
> it. They are taken aback by it. It stuns them. They sometimes think they have 
> gone nuts, and are unsure, especially if unprepared for the astonishing shift 
> in awareness.
> 
> Robin, to my mind, and remember I am saying 'to my mind', I might be wrong in 
> this - is deeply attached to both himself as a person (ego), and to a 
> particular brand of theology, not sure exactly what, it seems kind of 
> Catholic, but with the Robin twist. Barry has basically flown the coop here 
> regarding ideology, but he is still practicing some form of meditation. 
> Barry's ability to make fun of all the holy holies of spiritual life has a 
> certain insight into spiritual puffery and ostentation. He has taken me on 
> for this. But what that means is a lot of spiritual baggage has fallen off 
> from him. This does not mean enlightenment. This does not mean he is a 
> shining example of spirituality. Nobody here even agrees what a shining 
> example of spirituality is. Robin is preloaded with plan, and eventually 
> attempts to move one along that planned path. Barry does not care, but if he 
> gets you right, as he does sometimes, you move, but not according to some 
> preplanned path, he tries to get you to see your inanities and peculiarities 
> of belief. This is the difference between being sucked into some kind of 
> theology and experiencing spiritual spiritual growth. Spiritual growth 
> destroys your crap; it is not ultimately a respecter of what you believe, 
> because what you believe is just an idea in the mind about what is real. 
> Beliefs have a tenuous relationship with reality. You cannot get rid of them 
> all, but pruning is always in order. Barry takes pot shots at you. Robin 
> tries to suffocate you in his grasp. What Robin does does not feel liberating 
> in any way. It has some semblance to what some teachers of 'reality' do, but 
> the end result is different.
> 
> The reason I feel Barry is 'advanced' over Robin is I think there is less 
> obstruction in his mind as to what reality might really be, and thus, given 
> the right conditions, be more likely to slip into an enlightened realisation. 
> Robin of course says he already was, but it was a lie, and he destroyed it, 
> but now has another version of reality. If it had been real, there is nothing 
> he could have done to get rid of it, because it is not something you can 
> acquire in the first place. Robin has definitely had some profound mystical 
> experiences, and he is very into the metaphysical. But this is not to my mind 
> really related to spiritual growth. Enlightenment is not a special state of 
> holiness, it does not make you lord and master over others. It makes one 
> realise what a total idiot one has been in its pursuit. But the pursuit's 
> 'goal', if consummated finally settles one down, the mystery of life has a 
> curious resolution without the intrigue, or even the trials of life being 
> sapped away. So the pointless pursuit is felt to have been worthwhile. And 
> then one can be just an ordinary person. Robin does not want to be an 
> ordinary person, he wants to be in some highest state of personal ontology in 
> relation to a metaphysical super being, and make sure that you know that is 
> the case, and that for you that is not the case. 
> 
> Barry is pretty much a normal sort of person from what I can tell, in spite 
> of his pointed attacks on spiritual pomposity which can be perhaps a bit over 
> biting at times and his ongoing taunting of Judy and her supporters. But his 
> attack mode, if we characterise his writing style here, is also not the 
> mindless ad hominems of Ravi, or the fiendish snares of Robin's overtures.
> 
> Now Judy does not really talk about spirituality as such, so there is not 
> much way to even attempt such an evaluation of her - she is our editor. 
> However I can say I think I have learned more from interacting with Judy than 
> with Robin. I do find her annoying sometimes, but the first question I think 
> I should ask myself in such a situation is why do I feel that way? Being 
> peeved at someone has two loci - one's self and the other person.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=otJY2HvW3Bw


Reply via email to