http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ebOXokj_JsM
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Xenophaneros Anartaxius" <anartaxius@...> wrote: > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" <authfriend@> wrote: > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Xenophaneros Anartaxius" > > <anartaxius@> wrote: > > <snip> > > > Of course the other thing Robin could be doing, in the wake > > > of the disaster of being a world teacher, is regressing to > > > another path that he now feels more comfortable with, > > > > "Regressing"--nice choice of words, Xeno. > > > > > a path through Catholicism or an analogue thereof, wherein > > > he is discovering his relationship with the wholeness of > > > life via the concept of God and this god's attendant > > > attributes, such as Jesus etc. This is the way Christian > > > saints have evolved spiritually. > > > > It would be really helpful in understanding Robin's > > take on spirituality if you would read his posts rather > > than just making it up. If you don't want to bother to > > read his posts, best not to try to describe his "path" > > lest you get it wrong *again*, as you have here. > > I would be helpful Judy, when you criticise, to provide the *correct* > interpretation. When you say someone is wrong and leave it at that, it serves > no purpose, because it is then unclear that you know the proper understanding > either, in which case the criticism has no value. > Examples are welcome. > > After I wrote that, and before I read this, I was reading something that > Robin wrote to Emily, and it was not what I had encountered before, but it > was different enough that it made me wonder how consistent he is in what he > is espousing or whether a shift in his experience is going on, or based on my > past experience with him, whether he is just reeling her in. The jury (in my > mind) is out on that. I probably won't have time to work it out before I > leave the Internet behind for a short time. > > Everything we think about others is a kind of interpretation, not a reality > set in stone. What happens in the world is unalterable once it has happened > but the understandings of that, mind to mind, is very variable. Just compare > the RNC and the upcoming DNC, for example, in the views presented. > > Your view of the world is not the only view of the world that the world has. >
