Doc sez, A saint will not do harm.
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "guusschilder" <gschilder@...> wrote:
>
> There is NOTHING that a "Saint" will nòt do.
> That's the nice thing about saints:
> they will never fit into the prison of our(need for)definitions.
> _____________________________________________________
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wgm4u <no_reply@> wrote:
> >
> > Notice how MMY used to say that TM was all you needed to improve your life
> > and reach enlightenment? CC,GC and UC. So in his lectures he suggested that
> > all eight limbs of Patanjali weren't actually necessary, right? They (Yama
> > and NIyama) were, as the tmorg still says, the 'ends' and not the 'means',
> > right?
> >
> > But when you read MMY's Bhagavad Gita he says (in the appendix under Yoga)
> > that Patanjali meant for ALL eight limbs to be practiced *simultaneously*
> > (quote, MMY). Go figure? was MMY confused or just being clever? (I think
> > the later).
> >
> > So the question arises, "is this something a 'saint' would do"? and "do the
> > ends justify the means" as MMY so often made it appear?
> >
>
