--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Robin Carlsen" <maskedzebra@...> wrote: > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "seventhray1" <steve.sundur@> wrote: > > > > Judy, you do leave me speechless. Almost. It is at this point > > I reflect on the last Narnia book, "The Last Battle", when the > > ape "Shift" turns the truth upside down. And succeeds in doing > > so for a while. I guess that's a difference between that book > > and FFL. I don't think anyone is fooled here, even for a moment. > > > > I hope Robin doesn't turn on you here Judy. That could happen > > you know. > > ROBIN: Actually, this is the only moment in today's proceedings > where I feel you have hit a nerve, Steve. And I believe your > warning to Authfriend both timely and even portentous. I would > ask you, Authfriend, to be careful at this point. Curtis and I > understand each other. I don't know you at all. And sometimes I > think you act as if you know me much better than you do. Do you > understand this, Authfriend?
F*ck off, Zebra Baby. I don't give a crap about you and your Issues; I'm after Curtis here. Don't get in the way, OK? I know you better than I need to. > You will thank Steve someday for his rebuke here. But funny > thing is: the more I write into you, the more I like you! Yeah, yeah, very funny. Take your levers and hooks and grappling irons and go after somebody who hasn't made it all the way around the block even once yet. "Write into you," is that Canada-speak? Hey, I'll tell you where you can write into, mister. > But that doesn't change the wisdom of Steve's admonition, > as surely you must know, Authfriend. Nothing can ever change Steve's wisdom, I agree with you there. > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" <authfriend@> > > wrote: > > > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "seventhray1" steve.sundur@ > > wrote: > > > > > > > > This would be funny if it weren't so sad. Curtis is being pummeled > > > > because he has requested that Robin not make false quotes that are > > > > attributable to Curtis. > > > > > > No, that isn't why he's being pummeled. > > > > > > But his lunch is indeed getting eaten. He should be grateful > > > we aren't drinking his milkshake as well. > > > > > > We may get around to that, though. > > > > > > > > > > > > > Here we are on the playground. Robin steals Curtis' lunch. Curtis > > > > objects. > > > > > > > > Robin: "I never heard you say you wanted that lunch" > > > > > > > > Curtis: "Well I just assumed....." > > > > > > > > Robin: "Assumed what? How do I know you wanted to eat your lunch if > > you > > > > didn't say so? > > > > > > > > Curtis: "Normally I just eat my own lunch. Isn't that how it works?" > > > > > > > > Judy rambling up: "Yea, I didn't hear you say you wanted to eat your > > > > lunch. That makes it fair game. If you want your lunch, let's hear > > > > why. And it better be good" > > > > > > > > Robin: "Come on Judy. You eat the PP@J <mailto:PP@J , and I'll eat > > > > the Snickers bar and the jello" > > > > > > > > And off they go into the distance with Curtis' lunch > > > > > > > > > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" <authfriend@> > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "curtisdeltablues" > > > > curtisdeltablues@ wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "maskedzebra" > > <maskedzebra@> > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Dear Curtis, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Take the two instances where I have attempted to represent > > > > > > > your voice, and specify which passages in either post you > > > > > > > feel are untruthful; that is, you would not say what I have > > > > > > > you saying. "There were many statements in what you wrote > > > > > > > that I wouldn't want anyone to think I had generated". If > > > > > > > there are such statements, this tends to defeat my argument. > > > > > > > I would like some examples. > > > > > > > > > > > > I only read the last one, I couldn't find the first one. And > > > > > > no I don't need to go over the post to prove to you it doesn't > > > > > > represent my POV. > > > > > > > > > > You sure as hell do if you want to make a case for the > > > > > assertion Robin quotes, Curtis. > > > > > > > > > > You won't because you can't. > > > > > > > > > > Here's the first one, by the way: > > > > > > > > > > http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/message/319527 > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
