--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, turquoiseb <no_reply@...> wrote: > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "curtisdeltablues" <curtisdeltablues@> > wrote: > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" <authfriend@> wrote: > > > > > > Curtis *could* have avoided all but #1 (at least as far as we > > > know; was the email really all Sal's idea? did she run it by > > > him, and if so did he encourage her to send it?). > > > > Judy at her finest. > > > What a sad, ugly, vindictive cunt.
I hate to think that who you are is contained in this one sentence, but I fear it may be so. You tend to default to this every time you hit bottom, and that bottom appears to be, in some real sense, your essence. > > All of this because she can't get everyone on the > forum to hate someone she hates, in this case you. > > I've been trying to stay out of this silliness, > if for no other reason than I've got better things > to do than to relive Junior High School, but I'll > weigh in with my "take" on what Emily did, and > why. > > I once lived in a dorm that contained a rather > disturbed prankster. One of his favorite tricks > was to take a tall trash can, fill it with water, > and then lean it against the inward-opening door > of one of his victims. One of them. Because then > what he'd do is knock on the door, and at the > same time knock on the door of the other victim > on the opposite side of the hall, and run. > > Victim 1 would open the door and watch helplessly > at water cascaded all over his feet, his rugs, > and his room. Victim 2, opening his door to the > knock, would invariably laugh at Victim 1. At > that point, Victim 1 would attack Victim 2. Mean- > while the sick prankster was laughing down the > hall, having caused a fight between two people. > > My impression is that this is exactly what Emily > did, and intended to do. > > A mature person, sent an email that she didn't > take kindly to, would have replied to the sender > *in email*, telling her to buzz off, and never > said a word about it to anyone else. But Emily, > pussywhipped by Judy and wishing to get on her > good side, sent copies of the email to you and > to Judy. My "take" is that in so doing she was > trying to get you to criticize one of Judy's > announced "enemies," start a fight between you > and Sal, and thus get strokes from Judy for > having done it. > > She succeeded only in the latter, having made > an ass of herself in trying to start the fight. > > This behavior is so juvenile and pathetic that > I don't understand how anyone could be fascinated > enough by it to continue obsessing about it. > Including you, Curtis. This is just another > attempt by Judy to get people to pile on to one > of her enemies. You've seen it all before, as > has everyone else here. > > [Cop voice] Move along folks...nothing to see here. > > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "raunchydog" <raunchydog@> wrote: > > > > > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "curtisdeltablues" > > > > <curtisdeltablues@> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > -- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" <authfriend@> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "curtisdeltablues" > > > > > > <curtisdeltablues@> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > So Emily and I are cool now. Have fun with > > > > > > > whatever this thing is that seems to interest you. > > > > > > > > > > > > Have fun believing that you and Emily are cool now. > > > > > > > > > > I'm pretty sure that if you play the song "Imagine" > > > > > backwards, it generates one of your posts. > > > > > > > > > You may be cool with Emily, Curtis, but I doubt she's > > > > cool with you. After calling her motives into question > > > > so brutally, do you really think she trusts you? Just > > > > curious... > > > > > > There's a number of things Curtis can't change. > > > > > > 1. He can't change the ugly email Sal wrote Emily accusing > > > her of being mean to him. > > > 2. He can't change the fact that he then defended Sal on FFL. > > > 3. He can't change the fact that he tried to make Sal's email > > > sound like no big deal. > > > 4. He can't change the fact that he accused Emily of sending > > > me Sal's email to foment a public fight, after Emily had > > > explicitly explained otherwise. > > > > > > Why *would* Emily want to be "cool" with Curtis in light of > > > those facts? > > > > > > Nor can Curtis change the fact that I've also read Sal's email. > > > > > > Curtis *could* have avoided all but #1 (at least as far as we > > > know; was the email really all Sal's idea? did she run it by > > > him, and if so did he encourage her to send it?). If he had > > > not defended Sal, if he had acknowledged the ugliness of Sal's > > > email, if he hadn't attributed ulterior motives to Emily for > > > sending me the email, he wouldn't be out of favor with Emily, > > > and folks on FFL wouldn't be wondering about his integrity. > > > > > > If one of my supporters had written a nasty email to > > > someone viciously castigating them for purportedly putting > > > me down, and I found out about it, I'd call the emailer out > > > on FFL by name. > > > > > > Curtis *definitely* doesn't have the integrity to do that. > > > > > > > When Emily played off Robin's irony email did you think > > > > she was teasing you or did it piss you off? Was your > > > > poor treatment of her pay back for a bruised ego or did > > > > it have nothing to do with this: > > > > http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/message/319723 > > > > > > Good question. But if he deigns to respond to it, will we > > > have any reason to trust what he tells us? Will Emily? > > > > > >
