--- In [email protected], Share Long <sharelong60@...> wrote: > > Is this the one where Turq was trying to convert and > misrepresent me? Anyway, BW, to set the record straight, > the sensible positive clique I told Ravi to put me in > was the Curtis Susan Steven one. Never mentioned Vaj. > Did not include you BW in that clique because have > never thought the dumb c remark was positive. Or the > least bit funny. And several times mentioned that I > was referring to that situation only. Plus that I > didn't like cliques and would be independent re all > posts and pilings on. Then called fouls on Barry and > Judy and Curtis. So, BW, time has already told. But > perhaps you're not reading ALL my posts wink wink.
Share, you clearly didn't understand my "Time will tell" comment, and still don't. Part of what I was referring to is the difference between your *talk*, in which you claim to wish to end all of this petty, Junior-high-school-level nastiness, and your *walk*, in which you are one of the people perpetuating it. What do you think that your ego-need to "set the straight" DOES? Let's look at the numbers so far this new "posting week," shall we? So far, the person we all expected to try to restart last week's juvenile nasty-fest has made five posts attempting to do just that. You have made four on the same subject. So far. You may feel that in so doing you are just "defending yourself" or "setting the record straight," but the bottom line is that you've almost doubled the total number of nasty-fest posts. Have you ever considered walking away from the whole thing, and just *ignoring* the provocations meant to tempt you *into* perpetuating it? The reason that this person is focusing on YOU and no longer on C or myself is that she knows we won't fall for it any more unless she stoops to outright libel. So far, the only people besides yourself who *have* fallen for it this week and piled on the same old nastywagon were Awoe and Robin. Just sayin'...
