The thing is, almost everyone here already knows this. They know that the description below describes virtually ALL of Judy Stein's posts, and that she's got almost nothing else she can talk about. It's the same subject and the same *intent*, over and over and over and over. Every week, every month, every year, every decade.
And yet. And yet people still fall for it. She can still turn Fairfield Life into the insane asylum it was yesterday by simply trotting out the Same Old Subject, expressing the Same Old Intent, because she knows that several people will pile on to it and turn it into a flurry of posts, ALL of them basically either agreeing about who she's decided is BAD today, or defending them. Here's the thing -- "defending" them creates as many pile on posts as agreeing with her. So it's not just the minions who almost always pile on and join Judy in attacking the BAD Person du Jour -- Raunchydog, Ravi, Ann, Robin, and Jim Flanegin (doctordumbass) who are perpetuating these Attack Threads. It's ALSO the people who feel that they're "defending" the person or persons being attacked. Argue with her or agree with her -- if you reply to one of her single-subject attack posts, you're helping to perpetuate it. If you're part of the disruptive thread, you're helping to create the disruptive thread, and have thus lost your right to complain about the disruption. There is wisdom in the saying DO NOT FEED THE TROLLS. --- In [email protected], turquoiseb <no_reply@...> wrote: > > Someone here is BAD. > It could be Curtis, it could be Vaj, it could be Barry, > or it could be someone who has praised them, > supported them, or even had a pleasant > conversation with them. > > Whoever it is I'm attacking in this post, > they're BAD, and I'm going to prove it to you. > Now sit there and listen until I'm through, > and if you know what is good for you, > you'll join me in proving they're BAD, too. >
