So, it's all about Barry.

emptybill:
> None of these comments address the disparity between the traditional
> practice of Maitri Bhavana (the contemplative cultivation of loving
> kindness) versus the three little "impulses" used in tm-sanyama
> practice.
> 
> Having to follow strict institutional rules is no excuse for the absence
> of compassion. For example, Buddhist monks must strictly observe 253
> rules, Buddhist female monastics must observe 348 rules. However, these
> monastics are not thereby allowed to be assholes to people.
> 
> Administrative duties in Buddhist monasteries require many skill sets
> and yet maitri-bhavana is still enjoined as one of the most fundamental
> practices for everyone. Not that everyone in a monastery does them
> because most of their time is spent performing chants for the benefit of
> the lay people. That is how the monasteries earn donations. However, the
> administrators are answerable to the whole assembly of monastics for
> their behavior.
> 
> A total of nine little "impulses" doesn't seem to do much
> for practitioners supposed "evolution". In actual results, this
> practice seems unconnected to these administrator's personal
> consciousness, whether surface or deep, no matter how long or how much
> they have performed sanyama. This disconnect basically stands alone as
> an example of "something is missing".
> 
> That is why I included the example of the guided contemplation. It is
> one example of what seems missing.
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Buck" <dhamiltony2k5@> wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "emptybill" emptybill@ wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > > People wonder why administrators who practice the tm-sidhi program
> for
> > > 40 years are so unkind and uncaring. Look no farther than the how
> the
> > > first three sutra-s are practiced - three reps of three ideas ...
> that
> > > is all.
> > >
> >
> > That job.  I have friends who have experience working in the
> movement's course office over the years.  Hopefully the guidelines
> facilitate what is going on.  When the guidelines are less than fair to
> people there can be a lot of deep (spiritual) hurt in enforcing them
> where it wrecks people's lives as it can.  At times this has been real
> bad.  The course office position holds a lot of power over people. 
> There is a lot of communal hurt around that and the people working there
> end up a conduit for that communal hurt and consequent anger.  If
> someone doesn't have a thick skin before coming in to the job they get
> one or get out.  It's an soul corrupting job if ever there was one like
> being a Ring-bearer in Lord of the Rings.  Hopefully the guidelines help
> facilitate what we are doing and not get in the way of it.  The
> guidelines evidently have caused a lot of trouble that way.  There's a
> reality to that.
> > -Buck
> >
> >
> > > Although engaged with during tm-sanyama, the three sutra-s are
> initial
> > > ideas. Their possible results? According to MMY some feelings of
> > > "warmth". But why should only three repetitions of such introductory
> > > feelings produce a significant, lasting change in someone?
> > >
> > > MMY used to analogize every method other than tm/tm-sidhi as just
> > > another "cart and bullock" practice.
> > >
> > > As a counter-point, here is a condensed and succinct example of the
> main
> > > method used in the traditions of Patanjali Yogasutra-s and Gautama
> > > Buddha's eight-fold path. Once you get a feel for it, you will
> > > understand why these Abodes of Brahma (Brahma Viharas) are
> considered
> > > essential for actualizing and realizing awakened liberation.
> > >
> > > ……………………….
> > >
> > > The Four Brahma Viharas
> > >
> > > A guided meditation by Ven. Ayya Khema
> > >
> > > Think of the four brahma viharas, the four supreme emotions,
> > > loving-kindness, compassion, sympathetic joy (joy with others), and
> > > equanimity. And see them, as the Buddha explained them, as the only
> > > emotions worth having. Nothing else has any real place in our
> hearts.
> > > And think your heart as yearning to be filled with love and
> compassion,
> > > with joy with others, and equanimity. See your heart as yearning for
> > > that and then fill it with those emotions. The warmth of love. The
> care
> > > of compassion. The generosity of joy with others. And the
> peacefulness
> > > of equanimity. Fill your heart to the brim.
> > >
> > > And now spread the love and compassion, and the joy with others, and
> the
> > > equanimity through this room. So that there is the warmth and the
> care,
> > > the generosity and the peacefulness of it all through this room, so
> that
> > > everyone can partake of it.
> > >
> > > And now let these four emotions, with their warmth and their caring,
> > > their generosity and their peacefulness emanate from your heart and
> > > reach out to the people who are close to you, so that they can have
> part
> > > of it, without expecting that you can get the same back.
> > >
> > > Now let all your friends partake of the beautiful emanation from
> your
> > > heart. Loving and compassionate. Caring and peaceful.
> > >
> > > Now reach out to other people you know. Neighbors. People you might
> work
> > > with. Those you meet in everyday life. Let the heart full of
> > > loving-kindness and compassion reach out to all these people that
> you
> > > can think of.
> > >
> > > Now think anyone towards whom you have some negative feeling in your
> > > ordinary life, and don't change your heart now. Allow it to retain
> love
> > > and compassion, joy with others, and equanimity and let those same
> > > emotions reach out to that
> > > difficult person.
> > >
> > > Now feel your heart emanating the beautiful rays of love and
> compassion,
> > > the warmth and the caring, the giving and peacefulness and let these
> > > rays go out into the world and touch people's hearts near and far.
> > > Think of people around here and then go further afield. Letting
> these
> > > beautiful rays and emanations from your heart go to as many hearts
> as
> > > you can find.
> > >
> > > And put your attention back on yourself and feel the warmth of
> > > loving-kindness and the peacefulness of giving permeate you, fill
> you
> > > and surround you. The warmth in the heart brings joy and the
> > > peacefulness that surrounds you brings a feeling of security.
> > >
> > > May beings everywhere love each other.
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Share Long <sharelong60@>
> > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Dear Seek,  I agree that TMers are not necessarily more
> evolved or
> > > knowledgeable or calmer in turmoil or overall better humans than
> > > others.  However I also want to bring up an experience that has
> > > puzzled me for years.  It came up when, for emotional healing, I
> got
> > > involved with non TM groups.  BTW, both groups contained ex
> TMers as
> > > well as long term practicing TMers and non TMers.  To me, the
> non
> > > TMers in general just did not feel natural, which is not exactly the
> > > best word but comes closest.  Maybe unstraining is a better way
> to
> > > say it.  Some subtle energy of settledness missing.  Again,
> I'm
> > > fumbling for words and thinking out loud here.  But wanted to
> > > mention to get your feedback. Â Â
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > I also notice that a lot of people are familiar with New Age ideas
> and
> > > even wisdom.  But much of that sounds more like common sense to
> > > me.  Which is very good on that level.  Or New Age knowledge
> > > often puts the cart before the horse.  My favorite example is
> > > Eckhart Tolle and his teaching to be in the Now.  It's my
> experience
> > > that being in the Now is a result rather than a path.  It's also
> my
> > > experience that the Now contains both past and future so no need to
> > > avoid them.  Anyway, I'm ever grateful to Maharishi for his
> teaching
> > > on consciousness and its unfolding.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > At this point, I have not gone deeply into Buddhist or Taoist
> > > wisdom.  But what I have encountered nourishes my spirit. 
> I'm
> > > simply grateful for all the wisdom and practical help that is
> available
> > > these days.  And that it's my dharma to explore.
> > > > Share      Â
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > ________________________________
> > > >  From: seekliberation seekliberation@
> > > > To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
> > > > Sent: Wednesday, September 26, 2012 9:20 AM
> > > > Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: Apostate Meditators
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Â
> > > > I agree with you that transcendence is a deeper and more
> significant
> > > quality of consciousness and a major step towards evolution.  But
> this
> > > doesn't mean that every person who meditates is automatically more
> > > knowledgeable on spiritual topics than everyone else, nor does it
> mean
> > > they are further advanced through this cycle of birth and death just
> > > because of a technique learned in one lifetime.
> > > >
> > > > For example, Michael Phelps could stop swimming for the next 5
> years,
> > > and you and I could swim every day for the next 5 years.  He would
> still
> > > be faster 5 years from now.  In the same way you and I can't make up
> for
> > > all his mileage in just 5 years, meditators & Siddhas aren't
> necessarily
> > > going to make up for a lack of development for their last few
> lifetimes
> > > (or dozens/hundreds of lifetimes....however many there are).
> > > >
> > > > I'm not putting TM/TMSP down, i'm just saying that 'some' TMer's
> tend
> > > to assume they are ahead of everyone else out there who isn't
> practicing
> > > or hasn't learned TM.  Moreover, TM is not the 'only' way of
> > > experiencing transcendence (although it does seem a lot easier,
> IMO).
> > > For example, i've met a lot of people in my life who don't meditate
> that
> > > seem a lot more calm and relaxed in the midst of turmoil than any
> > > meditators I know.  How is that?  My only explanation is that
> > > transcendance is not a quality of consciousness only experienced by
> > > practice of TM.
> > > >
> > > > This isn't just an issue with meditation either.  It's everywhere.
> > > People sign up for a course, graduate from some class, attend a
> seminar,
> > > etc.... and all of a sudden they automatically assume they're more
> > > developed than anyone who hasn't signed up for that course.  This
> could
> > > be anything, spiritual or material in nature.
> > > >
> > > > seekliberation
> > > >
> > > > > Dear Liberation Seeker;
> > > > > Yes, so the science says so; that transcendence is the way of
> > > evolution.
> > > > > For many good reasons that even the science is showing now that
> > > > >  everyone should meditate, take time out and meditate.
> > > > > Yes, Transcendence is the way of any good meditation.
> > > > > According to TM research too.  (There'll be time for scientific
> > > reconciliation with the buddhists later).
> > > > >
> > > > > Now then, bliss also as sat-chit-ananda on the other hand as
> > > experienced in the subtle of the heart which other meditational
> > > techniques like http://www.vedicvibration.com/   and
> > > > > the Ved and Physiology meditational technique would cultivate.
> > > http://www.mumpress.com/other-items-of-interest/mvhp.html
> > > > > Even for the awakened there is more work to do.
> > > > > But certainly for the seeker.
> > > > >
> > > > > Best Regards,
> > > > > -Buck
> > > > >
> > > > > > After leaving Fairfield and being exposed to some other
> teachings,
> > > i've begun to assume we might not be as enlightened or as far
> through
> > > this cycle of birth and death that we seem to assume we are.  I
> admit I
> > > could be wrong, but that is my perception nonetheless.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Perhaps my fatalistic and pessimistic views towards America
> and
> > > the world in general would give some the impression that i'm no
> longer
> > > meditating, or never did in the first place.  So I guess one
> question
> > > would be how could you know or tell whether someone on FFL is or
> isn't a
> > > meditator unless they declare if they are or aren't?
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Besides, sometimes when we get wrapped up in our theoretical
> > > paradigms we never get the chance to test our theories where the
> rubber
> > > meets the road.  We often times just sit in our little world
> accusing
> > > everyone else of being so stupid for not understanding our perfect
> > > perceptions or theories.  Therefore, I think it is helpful to have
> the
> > > perceptions posted from someone who isn't a dedicated meditator.
> > > Sometimes it's irritating sometimes, but at the same time can help
> > > balance out perceptions and give a reality check to some people
> whose
> > > heads are in the clouds.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > seekliberation
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
>


Reply via email to