--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, khazana108 <no_reply@...> wrote: > > And here she goes again: > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" <authfriend@> wrote: > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Xenophaneros Anartaxius" > > <anartaxius@> wrote: > > > > > > > Always you are the honest one. > > > > Yeah, sorry you have a problem with the person you're > > arguing with being honest. > > <snip> > > > > If this were so unambiguous why the firestorm, both politically and in > > > the news? Obviously some is pure politics, but it seems it was the news > > > organisations like CNN that started poking around in the story and > > > undermining the administration's waffling on the issue. > > > > Disingenuous question. As you know, what I've said was > > unambiguous was Obama's Rose Garden statement as to > > the Benghazi attack being an act of terror.
I don't think Judy or Raunch know (or want to know) the meaning of the word 'generalization', which is what Obama did, on purpose. Obama made a generalization in the Rose Garden, he did not specifically say *the Benghazi attack* was a terrorist attack per se! Simple really, but partisans have a hard time seeing straight sometimes.
