Share, this is an example of another type of response - a descriptive and 
declarative statement by Ann, on Ann's point of view where the question is 
tossed around in a larger, if you will, arena, than just the "TMO rules" and 
gets to the question of "at what point is compromise worth the price?"

--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, awoelflebater <no_reply@...> wrote:
>
> 
> 
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Emily Reyn <emilymae.reyn@> wrote:
> >
> > Of course, org's are composed of people.  Does a 'few good people' mean 
> > that you compromise your core value system to continue if you find it at 
> > odds?
> 
> Excellent question and one I was just going to elaborate on before I read 
> this comment of yours Emily. It is fine and dandy to say one is sorry for 
> others being given a hard time but in Share's case she says she had been 
> "spared" more rigorous questioning on her other practices as they relate to 
> being allowed in the Dome etc. My problem  with this is that by valuing one's 
> privilege of being less aggressively challenged than others while at the same 
> time having access to the Domes is very self-serving in a way that, for me, 
> compromises many things. It essentially gives the green light to what I see 
> are heavy handed and short-sighted tactics by the TM movement. I see it as 
> endorsing police-state mentality by tacitly going along with how things are 
> run on campus/within the Movement and by the powers that be. I think there is 
> a limit to what one should allow to happen even though one still wants the 
> privilege of engaging in activities which are governed by such powers. There 
> comes a point when the compromises are not worth the price. But, again, I 
> have addressed this issue before and perhaps it is easy for me to be so 
> self-righteous in this instance since meditating and hopping around a 
> foam-lined building does not rate in my top ten choice of activities and thus 
> it would be easy for me to make a stand against "authority" in this case. On 
> the other hand, knowing myself as I do, I rather think I would rebel. I have 
> a rather perverse need to counteract immovable and unreasonable forces.
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > ________________________________
> >  From: Share Long <sharelong60@>
> > To: "FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com" <FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com> 
> > Sent: Thursday, October 25, 2012 10:33 AM
> > Subject: Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Fw: The Science of Compassion, for 
> > Wednesday
> >  
> > 
> >   
> > Jason, it's my experience that in every organization there are at least a 
> > few good people.  Michael, I had a similar interview to yours.  I am so 
> > sorry you were given such a hard time.  I admire how you handled the 
> > situation.   
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > ________________________________
> >  From: Jason <jedi_spock@>
> > To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com 
> > Sent: Thursday, October 25, 2012 4:05 AM
> > Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: Fw: The Science of Compassion, for Wednesday
> >  
> > 
> >   
> > 
> > 
> > You know, all these cults and religions have his 'shit herd' 
> > mentality.  I am thankfull that I never lived inside any 
> > cult or org.  Being on the outside gave me a 'ringside view' 
> > of a spectrum of these things.  I talk to a lot of people 
> > who are in cults and get an idea of what is happening 
> > inside.  You are better off alone.
> > 
> > All these orgs and cults are inhabited by such bureaucratic, 
> > pedantic, dicactic, dogmatic, zombie bots.
> > 
> > ---  Michael Jackson <mjackson74@> wrote:
> > >
> > > Sometimes there are extenuating circumstances. I quit going
> > > to the Dome when I was on staff due to a really serious allergy to
> > > formaldehyde, which in those days at least was a major component in 
> > > making foam. 
> > > The longer I was in the Dome, the worse I felt. 
> > > 
> > > 
> > > So I stopped
> > > going. I did program by myself in my pod room and felt great both in and 
> > > out of
> > > program. As twice a day in the Dome was part of the staff program, I was 
> > > called
> > > in to the Personnel Director's office (Bill Sands) and he gave me a 
> > > serious
> > > talk and threatened me with dismissal if I didn't start toeing the line.
> > > 
> > > I told him about the allergy and he said it didn't matter,
> > > rules were rules. I showed him the letter I had from my allergy doctor 
> > > (Allen
> > > Lieberman in Charleston SC) saying that I had to avoid formaldehyde 
> > > exposure. Bill
> > > said it still didn't matter. Rules were rules. No exceptions. 
> > > 
> > > So I returned to the Dome and after a couple days started
> > > feeling like crap again. So I thought about things and decided to write a
> > > letter to then TM Sidhi Administrator Greg Wilson and told him my story 
> > > and
> > > sent him a copy of the letter from my allergy doctor. 
> > > A
> > > nd a couple weeks later to my surprise he wrote me a letter
> > > back giving me permission to do program in my room, tho he suggested that 
> > > I
> > > might consider serving MIU in some other capacity since Dome attendance 
> > > was
> > > part of staff program. So I quit going to the Dome again. 
> > > 
> > > A couple weeks went by and I was called into Bill Sands office
> > > again, with my letters in my pocket. After he gave me hell and pretty 
> > > much told
> > > me my time at MIU was over, I told him I had permission from Greg Wilson 
> > > and
> > > showed him my letter, or rather a copy of it, I wisely had the original 
> > > in my
> > > room. 
> > > 
> > > Bill was completely discombobulated and hemmed and hawed and
> > > puffed and blustered but had to back down, but he didn't like it. So I 
> > > went
> > > back to doing program in my room and had great experiences and was much 
> > > more
> > > effective in activity for about eight months until Bill found a way to 
> > > get rid
> > > of me.
> > > 
> > > 
> > > 
> > > ________________________________
> > >  From: Buck <dhamiltony2k5@>
> > > Sent: Wednesday, October 24, 2012 12:52 PM
> > > Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: Fw: The Science of Compassion, for Wednesday
> > > 
> > >   
> > > This being Compassionate Posting Wednesday on FFL where ne'er a negative 
> > > word is written, I am not going to go on at all about just how stoopid 
> > > and undeserving it is that meditators who even live in Fairfield do not 
> > > come to the group meditation.  No, I'll save that for tomorrow and then 
> > > may be also consider the fallen away and outright meditation quitters out 
> > > in the world too; all those who have fell off the meditation wagon and 
> > > even walked away entirely.  I am excercising a lot of compassion for them 
> > > all right now today, 
> > > -Buck in the Dome 
> > >
> >
>


Reply via email to