--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" <authfriend@...> wrote: > > In a previous post today, I quoted a post of mine from > the beginning of October, just after Share had launched > her "psychological rape" accusation against Robin. The > portion I quoted had to do with my sense that people > with an anti-Robin agenda had been exploiting Share > behind the scenes, taking advantage of a misunderstanding > (on Share's part) that had occurred between Robin and > Share to further that agenda on FFL. I believe one of > them supplied her privately with the "psychological rape" > term to use against Robin. > > While I was looking for the post of mine I quoted, I > found another of my posts that bears on that issue, > which I think warrants another look. > > The important thing to note is how Share's version of > her misunderstanding with Robin changed radically > over time. > > What led her to contradict herself, to take a position > virtually 180 degrees from what she had said initially? > > We now know, because she has told us, that she's been > consulting with LordKnows privately about her issues > with Robin. I think there's a direct connection between > those consultations and her radical switch concerning > the significance of that initial misunderstanding with > Robin. I think LK worked on her--confronted her, perhaps-- > behind the scenes, pressured her to perceive Robin as > dangerous and disturbed, a "psychological rapist." > > And now he's trying to use her to convince us that Ann > has fallen into Robin's clutches. > > What is so amazing, even frightening, about all this is > that it's so reminiscent of what happened in the last > days of Robin's group, only now it's Robin who is being > labeled an "evil being." And along with this comes a > move to victimize Ann, *again*, as an "evil being," this > time for not hating Robin. > > Folks, it's a replay. Robin has long since rid himself of > his destructive penchant for casting out "evil beings." > But now his former followers have taken up *the very same > approach* they castigate Robin for having taken more than > 25 years ago. They aren't using the same words, but the > same basic witch-hunt idea is fully operative. > > Here's the post from October 2 about Share's perplexing > change of position, quoting her initial reaction to > her misunderstanding with Robin and then her description > of that reaction four weeks later: > > > Having read all the relevant posts, I am utterly baffled > and appalled at Share's use of this term ["psychological > rape"] to describe her interactions with Robin. I'd be > very curious to know where she got it from. Did someone > suggest it to her? > > This is such a serious charge, it's really important to > review some of the background. > > In her post today, Share writes: > > "Just for the record, this is exactly why I got so upset > initially with Robin about the Russian flash mob post. > Being psychologically raped didn't feel good then just > as it doesn't feel good now." > > Here is Share's initial comment to Robin about his > reaction to her remarks about the flash mob video > (September 4): > > "Yes I will excuse your presumption if you excuse my not going > down this particular rabbit hole again....So no problemo. Sigh, > btw, I notice I'm feeling grumpy this morning. Blaming it on > the sugar I ate yesterday. Somehow I've become very sensitive > to sugar. Anyway, Robin, apologies for taking it out on you." > > http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/message/319178 > > And here is what she wrote to Robin on September 9 > concerning this interaction: > > "As for what my feelings were, I didn't suffer or feel > insulted. Nor did I think you were being hurtful or cruel. > I simply did not want to pursue the theme of whether or not > I was being the real me. Nor the theme of my alleged hyper > positivity." > > http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/message/319500 > > So at the time that it happened, Share felt a little > grumpy and apologized to Robin. > > Four days later, Share affirmed that she had not been > insulted, did not suffer, did not think Robin was being > hurtful or cruel. > > Today, four weeks later, it was "psychological rape." > > Something isn't right here. Somehow Share has become > convinced that what at the time had caused no more > than a little grumpiness on her part (which she > attribted to eating sugar anyway) was a terrible act > of emotional violation equivalent to rape. > > (She had completely misinterpreted Robin's remarks > in any case, and he had practically stood on his head > explaining himself in the kindest possible manner.) > > The charge was made in public about an FFL member. I > think we need an explanation. What, or who, caused > Share to change her mind so drastically? > > http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/message/321696 >
I'm afraid that it's *both* a *what* and a *who*. The *what* is my refusal to include FF in my itinerary, in favor of NJ, to visit Share for a good spanking. This was the final straw in destroying her already fragile sense of self worth. As for the *who*, let's just say that I have perfected the siddhi of controlling a person's shattered mind over a great distance. I sincerely apologize, Share, and order you to once again start thinking for yourself. OK, mystery solved. Can we now return to a normal FFL...hey, wait a minute, this is normal for FFL. Carry on...
