--- In [email protected], "seventhray1" <lurkernomore20002000@...> wrote: > > --- In [email protected], "raunchydog" <raunchydog@> > wrote: > >> --- In [email protected], "seventhray1" > lurkernomore20002000@ wrote: > > > > Just remember what precipitated this latest twist- > > > Raunchy accusing Share of having a love interest in > > > Robin, and stalking him. > > > > Wrong again, Steve. An informed opinion is not an accusation, > > IMO. > > Okay. Raunchy, I really don't mean this as a slight, but one > must keep in mind that you are a recovering conspiracist. So, > I would think that you might want to give careful consideration > to opinions that could be interpreted as speculative. And yes, > it is my opinion, that your accusation of stalking and requited
(You mean "unrequited" here.) > love on Share's part was highly speculative. FWIW, Steve, raunchy is not the only one who strongly suspects that Share's behavior is a function of an unrequited emotional attachment to Robin. Some of us, in fact, perceived that attachment developing well before her misunderstanding of something he said to her mushroomed into a conflict between them. If you've followed my posts, you're aware that I have never been a conspiracist. I have frequently challenged conspiracy theories, including those of raunchy and Bhairitu. Nor are the folks with whom I have had private discussions about Share's apparent attachment to Robin conspiracists. So I'm afraid you cannot use the fact that raunchy has a tendency to see political conspiracies as a reason to dismiss her speculations about Share. Putting on my armchair psychiatrist's hat, I would guess that Share has a compulsion to reenact the scenario of her abandonment by her mother when she was a child with other people in her life when it appears to her that a fruitful relationship is developing. She sabotages it so that she can feel rejected and lash out at the person who has rejected her just as she lashed out--or perhaps wishes she had lashed out--at her mother. I doubt you read closely any of the interaction online between Share and Robin after she had intially dumped on him because of her misunderstanding of what he had said to her. It was evident to some of us that her purported attempts to reconcile with him were not only not sincere but designed--perhaps unconsciously--to make reconcilation impossible, to ensure that the door was slammed in her face, as she put it. I've never seen anyone make a more determined and earnest attempt to straighten out a misunderstanding than the one Robin made with Share. He stuck with it for far longer than he should have, in my opinion. But it was doomed from the start, because IMO Share, in some perverted way, does not feel real to herself unless she's feeling rejected. Her abandonment by her mother was the formative event in her life; she has let it define who she is, no matter how she has to twist the circumstances she finds herself in to make them conform to that pattern.
