--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Michael Jackson <mjackson74@...> wrote:
>
> Having read your comments and meditated on them I must say I am actually 
> happy with myself for asking these people who have made a lifestyle out of 
> lying to stop doing so. 

Well said, I think Hagelin should hand back his PHD and stop
using it as a plea to authority because people take that
stuff seriously. Trust me, a quantum physicist doing a rain dance
means *nothing* scientifically. You know that but a lot of
people in the TMO take him seriously because he used to work at 
CERN they think his opinion on everything is more likely to be 
right as long as he dresses it up with a bit of quark-babble. 

Like in his Physics of yogic flying lecture where he claims 
hopping up and down is caused by altering the position of 
particles at the quantum level and thus statistically altering 
the likelihood of gravity working in its familiar way. Uh huh.

 
> All I want is for the general public who are currently being blitzed and 
> deliberately so with a great deal of la la la 
> everything-about-TM-is-swell-sweet-and-good deserve to know what kind of 
> people they are dealing with.
> 
> It is rather typical of TM apologists to accuse people of "unstressing" when 
> they are merely stating facts the TMO doesn't want to admit to. Unstressing, 
> you know, the phenomenon that David Spector and Tammy on the cardio blog 
> won't admit exists?


 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> ________________________________
>  From: nablusoss1008 <no_re...@yahoogroups.com>
> To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com 
> Sent: Monday, November 19, 2012 8:41 AM
> Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: TM studies and dueling comments.
>  
> 
>   
> 
> 
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Michael Jackson <mjackson74@> wrote:
> >
> > Whether you and other TM apologists like it or not, if you want the general 
> > public to dote on TM like you do, you are going to have to deal with the 
> > baggage the Movement has generated for nearly 60 years - you can't expect 
> > this info to be taken in a vacuum - as in pay attention to what we tell you 
> > to pay attention to, pay no attention to that man behind the curtain. 
> > 
> > I don't rant 
> 
> Even compared to the colourful persona on this forum you are unusually full 
> of your self and obsessed with your own unstressing.
> 
> - I want people to have the full picture, 
> 
> Which you are not even close to be able to give. Have a reality check, or 
> even better; have your meditation checked.
>


Reply via email to