Dear Share: I hear you. Is this what your pastoral counselor told you to say? It doesn't address what was the question, and the situation has now passed, but what I heard was....you tiptoeing out. This is a nice sentiment and I'm glad you are happily back to your positive self. Compassionately, Emily.
________________________________ From: Share Long <[email protected]> To: "[email protected]" <[email protected]> Sent: Sunday, November 18, 2012 1:41 PM Subject: Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: was there stalking and if so who actually did it Robin, I wish more peace and enjoyment for everyone on FFL. To the best of my ability, given my limitations, etc. I will aim for that in my actions here, meaning in this and in my future posts. I also wish you more peace and enjoyment in whatever course of action you choose. Share ________________________________ From: Robin Carlsen <[email protected]> To: [email protected] Sent: Sunday, November 18, 2012 8:26 AM Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: was there stalking and if so who actually did it Share: I believe that the offline correspondence between us, when I assumed you were trying to resolve this matter in good faith will seriously contradict the impression you are giving here in this post of what went on between us. I do not believe any of that correspondence is 'personal' in a way which would compromise either of us. But it will most certainly reveal each of our motives and the extent to which what you have written here represents what is the real story. The letters I wrote to you, the letters you wrote to me: these go right to the heart of the matter. Are you willing to look those letters over and then give your permission for me to post them? I will state quite categorically that those letters will enable an objective reader to form a judgment of this matter which is cognizant of all the important facts. I would ask you to look over that correspondence and allow those letters to be posted on this forum. Robin --- In [email protected], Share Long <sharelong60@...> wrote: > > hey FFL I've avoided bringing this up because to do so felt right. But now > Raunchy has accused me of stalking. And more importantly, Robin has allowed > that accusation to stand. Here are two cyber events I remember. You all can > decide if there was stalking. And if so, who actually did the stalking. > > > The first upset between me and Robin began on Sept 6. On Sept 9 Judy barged > in. Some time later, I only remember that it was a Monday, Robin announced > to me online that he had nothing further to say about it all. He included an > email that he had sent to me offline the night before. The following Friday > he posted out. It seemed to be intentional. The very next day, Saturday, he > contacted me offline continuing the upset. Even though on the previous > Monday he had said online that he had nothing further to say about it. And 2 > or 3 days later he sent me his photo THOUGH I HAD NEVER OFFLINE NOR ONLINE > REQUESTED IT. Ok, I'm not calling this stalking, but it's clear to me that > Robin was the one who was continuing contact. And changing it somehow with > the addition of the unrequested photo. > > > The second cyber event added the element of, well again you all decide. > Robin again emailed me offline after ending online communication. It was a > day when I had been out and about all day so I received all three emails at > the same time. In the first email he said that he was considering if he > should post all our offline communication onto FFL. My immediate thought > was, why? For what purpose? But there also seemed to be a subtle threat > especially in light of the second email. See next paragraph. A threat which > btw was nonetheless ineffective because the most personal info I had shared > with Robin offline was about having no contact with my Mom for 2 1/2 years > after she left my Dad when I was 4. BTW, I know this happened to help me pay > off my karmic debt. > > > Anyway, Robin's second email was a terse 2 liner saying that I had til 11 pm > that night to give me my answer about whether or not he should post our > offline emails. The third email contained in the Subject line: I have > decided against it. > > > Again, I'm not calling this stalking. But it demonstrates that it was Robin, > not me who continued communication between us. >
