Damn, you're good Raunchy!

--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "raunchydog" <raunchydog@...>
wrote:
>
>
http://www.muscleandstrength.com/sites/default/files/images/articles/art\
icles/bonehead_0.jpg
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "seventhray27" steve.sundur@
wrote:
> >
> >
> > Is this woman, superwoman? From all the fantastic abilities which
are
> > attributed to her, she must be. I mean Judy saves one of her few
> > remaining posts to zing her. Ravi devotes a good part his posts to
> > comment about her. She certainly has gotten Emily's attention.
> >
> > I mean here she arrives from Batgap with her bonnet and suitcase and
> > soon after the place goes gaga about her.
> >
> > I don't know if this is exactly appropiate, but I always liked it.
> >
> > http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=04aLUkVJAAw
> > <http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=04aLUkVJAAw>
> >
> >
> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Ravi Chivukula
> > <chivukula.ravi@> wrote:
> > >
> > > Share is struggling to survive - there are lot of threats to her
well
> > being
> > > - people, online cults, groups wanting to prey, pile on an pure,
> > gullible,
> > > innocent woman like her. She's the victim here. She has to be
strong,
> > no
> > > can be trusted else she will be exposed, she will be hurt, harmed
-
> > she has
> > > put up a brave face, come up with strong, fancy, clever pushbacks,
> > > putdowns, comebacks against these devious, cunning people (however
> > lame and
> > > stupid they may come across to normal people like us).
> > >
> > > I have lived with a person with the same psychological profile. No
> > matter
> > > how much I said I loved this person, that I would never harm, that
I
> > would
> > > always protect - it was not enough, it was ultimately useless, I
was
> > > totally defeated in my intentions - I had to ultimately choose my
> > sanity.
> > >
> > > On Tue, Dec 11, 2012 at 2:24 PM, authfriend authfriend@ wrote:
> > >
> > > > **
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Definitive, Emily.
> > > >
> > > > I would only mention in addition the continuous stream of
> > > > falsehoods and disingenuities, including the thoroughly
> > > > insincere "ha ha's" and "dears" and smiley faces attached
> > > > to the mean cracks. There isn't an authentic bone in this
> > > > woman's body--or at least in the persona she presents to
> > > > us on FFL.
> > > >
> > > > Share Snow Job.
> > > >
> > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Emily Reyn emilymae.reyn@
> > > > wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > Dear Share - you have missed the point entirely and are again
> > restating
> > > > your righteousness in assigning those you don't like to a cult.
> > Â Clearly
> > > > you believe this. Â I reject this concept completely, just
so
> > you know, and
> > > > want to inform you that your black and white, polarized thinking
is
> > not
> > > > doing you any service. Â You are seemingly in unbelievable
> > denial about
> > > > your own self, despite all this meditation and healing you do,
and
> > my
> > > > opinion is that you subconsciously use it *to* avoid yourself
and
> > bolster
> > > > your false self and attitude of self-righteousness so you never
have
> > to get
> > > > real with anyone.
> > > > >
> > > > > You may take this conclusion from me as what I think sincerely
at
> > this
> > > > point in time. Â You routinely exercise a mean streak.
Â
> > *You* don't have
> > > > the cojones to admit or defend or discuss anything you post -
you
> > simply
> > > > launch one attack after another. Â I'm guessing you do see
> > yourself as a
> > > > savior, don't you - the "butter bouncer" in this latest
scenario.
> > Â
> > > > >
> > > > > So far, we've had "psychological rape", "vile accusations"
"wts",
> > "FFL
> > > > high school with the penguins," numerous suggestions, put-downs,
> > > > name-calling, and judgments, your promise to pray for us, your
> > wishing
> > > > "complete" healing on us all, your doing everything possible to
> > avoid
> > > > having a discussion about anything with anybody who might
challenge
> > you
> > > > (which btw is everyone on this forum), and your constant acting
out
> > of your
> > > > vision of yourself as a victim of those you've identified as
your
> > > > "enemies." Â I'm too exhausted to continue. Â
> > > > >
> > > > > If you had any ability to both take it and give it, I might
> > forgive this
> > > > and commend you on your creative use of the term "butter."
Â
> > Unfortunately,
> > > > I sincerely believe you actually believe all this and the
undertones
> > are
> > > > intuitively mean. Â If I respond with humor, you'll call me
> > "creepy" right?
> > > > Â Â
> > > > >
> > > > > Why are you here, Share? Â What do you get out of this
> > forum?Â
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > ________________________________
> > > > > From: Share Long sharelong60@
> > > >
> > > > > To: "fairfieldlife@yahoogroups.com"
fairfieldlife@yahoogroups.com
> > > > > Sent: Tuesday, December 11, 2012 4:34 AM
> > > > > Subject: [FairfieldLife] bye bye wts hello dear Buttery Ones
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > Â
> > > > > Concerned about lack of blood flow in Judy and Emily due to
> > twisted
> > > > knickers over my usage of wts, I will instead use Buttery Ones
to
> > designate
> > > > a grouping of certain FFL posters:
> > > > > Robin depending if he ironic or not is Melted Butter or
Cultured
> > Butter
> > > > > Judy depending if she is vitriolic or not is Churned Butter or
> > Unsalted
> > > > Butter
> > > > > Raunchy depending if she is nasty or not is Rancid Butter or
Goat
> > Milk
> > > > Butter
> > > > > Ann depending is she's at her stores or with her horses is
Waffle
> > Butter
> > > > or Organic Butter
> > > > >
> > > > > Emily depending on her state is either Butter Cookies or
Buttered
> > Rum
> > > > > Ravi depending on his state is either Clarified Butter (Ghee)
or
> > sorry I
> > > > can't resist, Nut Butter
> > > > >
> > > > > Though not an official member of Buttery Ones, me with a wink
to
> > Barry,
> > > > I'm Butter Bouncer ha ha
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > Dear BO (Buttery Ones)
> > > > > Steve has been slathered enough don't you think? But to
set
> > the record
> > > > straight he's correct about why I didn't reply to Ravi.Â
What
> > Ravi said
> > > > about John Newton is not what I would call a conversational
opener
> > if you
> > > > know what I mean. As for Ann, I think she initially posted
> > John's photo
> > > > and then a big excerpt from his website. But I don't
remember
> > that she
> > > > said anything nasty about him. Did I miss something
> > important? Anyway,
> > > > I was glad she posted his info.Â
> > > > >
> > > > > Yeah, I got triggered by what Rancid Bu er Raunchy said about
> > John. So
> > > > what?! Oh right, like you all NEVER get triggered?!Â
Or
> > if you do, it's
> > > > only about Really Important Stuff. Whatever!
> > > > >
> > > > > Emily I was not suggesting that anyone needed HELP from John
> > Newton. I
> > > > think I used the phrase EXTRA BENEFITS. And I think
Raunchy
> > knows exactly
> > > > what I mean by people in her life in this context. BTW,
yes we
> > are moving
> > > > onto other topics now. Slowly but surely. Kind of
like
> > Oozing Butter.
> > > > >
> > > > > Anyway, I aim to avoid using wts. Though even in recent
> > posts there is
> > > > evidence of more wts thinking. Sigh...a
> > > > > Butter Bouncer's work is never done (-: Â
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
>


Reply via email to