Oh man that was hilarious! I haven't laughed that loud in a while - thanks 
Barry - I feel so much better now that I know I am meditating correctly - nex 
time maybe Curtis will check and I can time travel and get a glimpse of a 25 
year old Sophia Loren.




________________________________
 From: turquoiseb <no_re...@yahoogroups.com>
To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com 
Sent: Wednesday, December 12, 2012 2:07 PM
Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: The "Gotta-Blame-Maharishi-for-My-miserable-Life" 
club
 

  
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Michael Jackson <mjackson74@...> wrote:
>
> OK I will agree to get my TM meditation checked as long 
> as Barry does the checking procedure (he usta be one-a 
> them TM guv'ners you know) will that count?

"Let's close our eyes, making sure not to visualize
the title credits of Baywatch, with all of those buxom
babes bouncing down the beach in slow motion."

[ After 30 seconds ]

"Let's open the eyes. It was easy?"

[ Whatever he says, answer, "Yes, good, fine, etc.]

"Yes, good, fine, etc. Did you notice how easily and
effortlessly the thoughts of Pamela Anderson's bouncing 
boobies came to you? That is how easily you should think 
the mantra." 

[ ? ]

"What's a mantra? Oh, it's that thing you used to think
about when you were meditating. Not nearly as charming
as boobies, eh? Good job. You're 'checked.' Go forth
and meditate this effortlessly from now on. Jai Guru 
Hasselhoff."

> ________________________________
>  From: nablusoss1008 <no_re...@yahoogroups.com>
> To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com 
> Sent: Wednesday, December 12, 2012 1:34 PM
> Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: The 
> "Gotta-Blame-Maharishi-for-My-miserable-Life" club
> 
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, nablusoss1008 <no_reply@> wrote:
> >
> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Michael Jackson <mjackson74@> wrote:
> > >
> > > do I get to be secretary?
> > 
> > No, but perhaps Curtis will confer you the title Honourable 
> > Member for life ? Please remember that membership is evoked 
> > the day you have a checking.
> 
> Should have been *revoked* :-)
>


 

Reply via email to