--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Michael Jackson <mjackson74@...> wrote: > > Bbbbbbut...wha wha wha what if we had us some visions of our past lives? What > do we think then? (Happened to me at MIU - he he!)
That may be fine but just don't believe anyone else if they tell you they know what your past lives were. Or if they know that John Doe was Mussolini in their last life. Again, even if you have your own personal glimpses of what your former incarnations were, they are still unprovable but if that is what rocks your boat, imagine on! > > > > > ________________________________ > From: Ann <awoelflebater@...> > To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com > Sent: Sunday, December 30, 2012 9:30 AM > Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: Lincoln > > > Â > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, nablusoss1008 <no_reply@> wrote: > > > > > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Ann" <awoelflebater@> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, srijau@ <no_reply@> wrote: > > > > > > > > PVR Narasimha Rao says that it looks like Lincoln is re-incarnated > > > > right now based on the birth chart of a well-known individual but I > > > > would imagine that person does not know it or believe it himself. > > > > > > So then what does it matter? > > > > > > > Who says it matters ? > > "Who says", you ask? Why, the people who take the time and trouble to > conjecture on such things obviously think it matters. Seems a complete waste > of time to me. No one could ever prove something like this and even if > someone was Lincoln in one life it has no bearing on who they are currently, > what they remember, what they will do in this new body. How does one possibly > come up with these theories anyway? Much better to figure out who we are in > this lifetime since there isn't even a way to prove we live multiple, > reincarnated lives and all we really have is the 'what's happenin' now'. It > never ceases to astound me the things people think up to spend their time > pursuing. Lincoln, my ass. > > It's a simply fact that people die and later gets a new body. Same will > happen to you, so "make hay when the sun shines" :-) > > > > > > My God, some of you live in a dream world. Assertions are made and not a > > hope in Hell of proving anything. Lincoln one day, some bum the next. All > > in a day's work. > > > > > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, nablusoss1008 <no_reply@> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Bhairitu <noozguru@> wrote: > > > > > > Scorsese in his commentary on "Gangs of New York" talked about > > > > > > Lincoln > > > > > > not being a popular as our school history books would have made > > > > > > out. > > > > > > Some of those facts come out in the film. Similarly his HBO series > > > > > > "Boardwalk Empire" mirrors much of the corruption we see in modern > > > > > > day > > > > > > politics. > > > > > > > > > > > > I'll get around to seeing "Lincoln" probably the way I watched "The > > > > > > Dark > > > > > > Night Rises" on Bluray as I did last night. First off I was pissed > > > > > > that > > > > > > the was mostly 16:9 instead of 2:35:1. Gives me pause to ever rent > > > > > > another WB title again. Second, the story seemed to telegraph to > > > > > > the > > > > > > audience that it is bad to go up against the rich and be for the > > > > > > people. That seemed to be some social engineering that wasn't > > > > > > needed. > > > > > > Afterward I found a Netflix indie to wash my palette. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > The incarnation of Lincoln is today a highly developed individual > > > > > living in Washington DC were he works for the government. I wouldn't > > > > > be surprised if Scorsese, a long-time TM meditator, interviewed > > > > > "Lincoln". > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
