Not to worry, Carol. I've been called creepy too. Sal and Barry are exercising double standards - it's O.K. for them to trash TM and TM-doers repeatedly, but not O.K. for you to post a balanced review of your experience with Mr. Knapp and his counseling services. Makes no sense at all. Glad you showed up here and post as much and about whatever you life as often as you like. There is nothing but benefit to be gained by multiple perspectives.
>________________________________ > From: Carol <jchwe...@gmail.com> >To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com >Sent: Monday, January 7, 2013 7:09 AM >Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: Turq's Occult Theory Of What Motivates >Cyberstalkers > > > >Hey Saly.. > >Thanks for you analysis. But, like Barry, you know little and almost nothing >about me or the situation. > >If you bothered to read before throwing out your analysis, maybe you could >state some criticism that is factual and holds some weight. I'm not out to get >anyone on my side. Regardless, as I stated to Barry, your impression is noted. > >As far as Knapp not being around to defend himself, he can come here and >defend himself if he so desires; it's a public board. > >All that said, the Knapp discussion is pretty much dead at this point...except >that you bring it up here. > >Combining yours and Barry's labels toward me, I am a creepy loon. Loons fly, >they don't creep. > >Happy 2013... > >************** > >--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "salyavin808" wrote: >> >> >> >> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" wrote: >> > >> > Since I'm obviously one of the people Barry is libeling with >> > the term "cyberstalker," >> >> I can remember when you used to work out what time Barry made >> his first post of the day, you'd then triumphantly post this fact >> as though it proved some point. Dead creepy behaviour, kind of worrying you >> don't have the self-awareness to realise it. Maybe >> Carol shouldn't take your analyses at face value? >> >> But Carol is a bit creepy too, she turns up here simply to rubbish >> someone who isn't around to defend themselves to a bunch of >> people with - what? a presumed shared dislike of TM? Is that what >> this is about, TM gets criticised here and J Knapp does some criticising too >> so therefore there must be something deficient with >> TM critics? Or does she assume we are all good mates and is trying >> to drive a presumed wedge between anyone who might have TM-free >> sympathies? >> >> Whatever it is, it doesn't come across as a public service announcement, >> more like some revenge fantasy. The only thing that's obvious is that she >> needs more therapy to work out why she behaves >> in this peculiar way. I fear that getting Judy on her side will >> only entrench it, you don't find healthy closure from someone who >> has to work out what time her "enemies" get out of bed in the morning when >> they live on the other side of the atlantic. >> > > > > >