You are right, and I misstated your name and used the word "life" instead of "like" - it was before I had experienced the psychoactive effect of the coffee I drink every morning, like a good addict should. At least, that's the best excuse I can come up with for now. I'm sorry.
>________________________________ > From: salyavin808 <fintlewoodle...@mail.com> >To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com >Sent: Monday, January 7, 2013 10:17 AM >Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: Turq's Occult Theory Of What Motivates >Cyberstalkers > > > > > >--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Emily Reyn wrote: >> >> Not to worry, Carol. Â I've been called creepy too. Â Sal and Barry are >> exercising double standards - it's O.K. for them to trash TM and TM-doers >> repeatedly, > >Erm, who does this? > >but not O.K. for you to post a balanced review of your experience with Mr. >Knapp and his counseling services. Â Makes no sense at all. Â Glad you showed >up here and post as much and about whatever you life as often as you like. Â >There is nothing but benefit to be gained by multiple perspectives. Â Â >> >> >> >> >________________________________ >> > From: Carol >> >To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com >> >Sent: Monday, January 7, 2013 7:09 AM >> >Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: Turq's Occult Theory Of What Motivates >> >Cyberstalkers >> > >> > >> >Â >> >Hey Saly.. >> > >> >Thanks for you analysis. But, like Barry, you know little and almost >> >nothing about me or the situation. >> > >> >If you bothered to read before throwing out your analysis, maybe you could >> >state some criticism that is factual and holds some weight. I'm not out to >> >get anyone on my side. Regardless, as I stated to Barry, your impression is >> >noted. >> > >> >As far as Knapp not being around to defend himself, he can come here and >> >defend himself if he so desires; it's a public board. >> > >> >All that said, the Knapp discussion is pretty much dead at this >> >point...except that you bring it up here. >> > >> >Combining yours and Barry's labels toward me, I am a creepy loon. Loons >> >fly, they don't creep. >> > >> >Happy 2013... >> > >> >************** >> > >> >--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "salyavin808" wrote: >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" wrote: >> >> > >> >> > Since I'm obviously one of the people Barry is libeling with >> >> > the term "cyberstalker," >> >> >> >> I can remember when you used to work out what time Barry made >> >> his first post of the day, you'd then triumphantly post this fact >> >> as though it proved some point. Dead creepy behaviour, kind of worrying >> >> you don't have the self-awareness to realise it. Maybe >> >> Carol shouldn't take your analyses at face value? >> >> >> >> But Carol is a bit creepy too, she turns up here simply to rubbish >> >> someone who isn't around to defend themselves to a bunch of >> >> people with - what? a presumed shared dislike of TM? Is that what >> >> this is about, TM gets criticised here and J Knapp does some criticising >> >> too so therefore there must be something deficient with >> >> TM critics? Or does she assume we are all good mates and is trying >> >> to drive a presumed wedge between anyone who might have TM-free >> >> sympathies? >> >> >> >> Whatever it is, it doesn't come across as a public service announcement, >> >> more like some revenge fantasy. The only thing that's obvious is that she >> >> needs more therapy to work out why she behaves >> >> in this peculiar way. I fear that getting Judy on her side will >> >> only entrench it, you don't find healthy closure from someone who >> >> has to work out what time her "enemies" get out of bed in the morning >> >> when they live on the other side of the atlantic. >> >> >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > > > > >
