--- In [email protected], "Rory Goff" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > --- In [email protected], "authfriend" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > > > Are you saying your status as an Awakened One validates > > your perception that 9/11 and Hurricane Katrina were > > engineered by our government? > > *lol* No. To anyone believing themselves unAwakened, my so- > called "status as an Awakened One" validates exactly nothing -- > other than my obvious irrationality. Well, that's not quite true -- > I am validating the Me inside of You, and the You inside of Me, but > if you are denying the former, you will probably be denying the > latter, and vice versa, for they are the same.
Yeah, well, that also means 9/11 and Katrina and our government are also inside you, so why couldn't you have a perception of them? > Many are documenting and validating the deeper details of 9/11, to > my satisfaction at least. Mmm. I'd say you're easily satisfied. My own suspicion (not that you asked) is that a lot of these "deeper details" are deliberate disinformation, sexy conspiracy stuff planted to lure attention away from the pursuit of facts that are actually much closer to the surface, much more banal and mundane, but no less evil--just less titillating: incompetence, indifference, hubris, and CYA. And quite possibly subsequent exploitation for personal and political benefit. The conspiracy theories, I think, are political pornography. People get addicted to them because they're exciting and mysterious; and they suck up energy that could be used much more constructively. It's in the interests of the real villains to keep folks chasing after sinister-looking shadows. > I have no idea really whether Hurricane Katrina was similarly > engineered by *portions of* our government -- I am simply noting > that the means were probably available (to some at least), the > motive appears to be moving in the same pattern as that of 9/11, > and as in 9/11, asking the question "Cui bono?" -- who benefits? -- > may well provide a clue into who is preparing to benefit from the > opportunities inherent in this latest "problem" - "reaction" - > "solution" scenario. This strikes me as post hoc, ergo propter hoc. Did I let my child wander out in the street so that I could collect a huge judgment from the drunken driver who struck her and disabled her for life? (Hypothetical.) ------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor --------------------~--> Get fast access to your favorite Yahoo! Groups. Make Yahoo! your home page http://us.click.yahoo.com/dpRU5A/wUILAA/yQLSAA/JjtolB/TM --------------------------------------------------------------------~-> To subscribe, send a message to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Or go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/ and click 'Join This Group!' Yahoo! Groups Links <*> To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/ <*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
