It's not about counting posts. Hell, a lot of brilliant math people can't do simple accounting. Too machine like. Computers are better at counting. It's that people on the path to enlightenment shouldn't be worried too much about people over posting. They should have just ignored those people. It was as if some post was going to contain that little morsel of knowledge that might suddenly pop them into enlightenment and they didn't want to miss it. Crazy.
On 01/22/2013 01:29 PM, emilymae.reyn wrote: > Hey now, not all of us are enlightened :) And, even those that claim they > are or are dedicated to that cause, they're no better than the rest of us at > counting from what I've noted. Yahoo has been messing up for awhile now, > more so since they revamped their look, or whatever. > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Bhairitu wrote: >> On 01/22/2013 05:35 AM, Alex Stanley wrote: >>> The post count that showed up last night was from the 19th. I logged into >>> the post count's gmail account, and there was an error message about >>> another post count mail being unable to be delivered: >>> >>> :::: begin quote :::: >>> >>> Hi. This is the qmail-send program at m1.grp.bf1.yahoo.com. >>> I'm afraid I wasn't able to deliver your message to the following addresses. >>> This is a permanent error; I've given up. Sorry it didn't work out. >>> >>> : >>> values:[ffl.postcount@...][FairfieldLife][FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com] >>> Pid: 28299 Processing:(mail,us,ffl.postcount@...,FairfieldLife) >>> DKIM-Status: Success domain_keys.c@118 >>> at [addtogs.c:462] >>> script=/home/y/libexec/ygp_mail/mail/dosend >>> level=E_ERROR >>> Reason: >>> gs_archive error: 14 (listID=3920196 host=10.193.39.130 >>> loc=gs;area524/96/01/g3920196) >>> dosend: fatal: gs_archive error: 14 (listID=3920196 host=10.193.39.130 >>> loc=gs;area524/96/01/g3920196) >>> I'm not going to try again; this message has been in the queue too long. >>> >>> :::: end quote :::: >>> >>> I have no idea what's going on with yahoo and the post count mails, but the >>> whole post count rule depends on it. There is no way in hell that I'm going >>> to manually count people's posts and keep track of the post count myself, >>> so as far as I'm concerned, if the post counts don't start showing up in a >>> timely manner, the post count rule is toast. >> Well there is the Python script I posted to the files section under >> Tools. If you are getting FFL via email and via a client that uses MBox >> files to store the messages it works pretty slick and easy to set up >> (instructions are in the file). The only differences will be if an >> email to your account gets delayed. Of course I find it amusing that a >> group of "supposedly enlightened" people requires having a post count. :-D >> >> Here's the output as of a few minutes ago from the Python script. >> >> Start Date (UTC): Sun Jan 20 00:00:00 2013 >> End Date (UTC): Sun Jan 27 00:00:00 2013 >> 176 messages as of (UTC) Tue Jan 22 16:36:58 2013 >> >> 19 authfriend >> 19 Share Long >> 16 Michael Jackson >> 12 nablusoss1008 >> 11 turquoiseb >> 11 doctordumbass@... >> 10 Buck >> 8 seventhray27 >> 8 Xenophaneros Anartaxius >> 7 salyavin808 >> 7 card >> 6 Ann >> 5 Duveyoung >> 4 Ravi Chivukula >> 4 Bhairitu >> 3 raunchydog >> 3 Richard J. Williams >> 3 FFL PostCount >> 2 merlin >> 2 emptybill >> 2 emilymae.reyn >> 2 Susan >> 2 John >> 2 Emily Reyn >> 2 Alex Stanley >> 1 obbajeeba >> 1 laughinggull108 >> 1 feste37 >> 1 earthensunreborn >> 1 Rick Archer >> 1 Mike Dixon >> >> Posters: 31 >> > >