Judy, what I gather is that a big part of your personality is to engage
in petty, mean spirited, meaningless debates.  So, I am sorry if I don't
accord your opinions much respect.  But, to borrow a line from Share,
still wishing you healing in this regard.


--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" wrote:
>
> Steve, the great advantage of the macro I suggested is that
> it wouldn't reveal the deficiencies in your thinking processes
> that show up when you attempt to construct reasons for your
> conclusions.
>
>
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "seventhray27" wrote:
> >
> >
> > Guess it turns out that Share and Michael are able to communicate in
a
> > civil way, and iron out any differences. Sure a far cry from the way
> > Barry and Judy wished to charactorize the interaction. But I guess
if
> > you see an opening to push your agenda you're going to do it,
whether it
> > makes sense or not.
> >
> >
> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Michael Jackson wrote:
> > >
> > > Thanks for the good wishes, Share - being on FFL has been a
learning
> > experience for me in many ways.
> > >
> > > In part it has helped me to deal with the unresolved
understandings of
> > how something that appeared to be so good for me could come in the
> > context of what in the past was odd and incomprehensible behavior
from
> > Maha and his TM Movement. I have now a clear understanding of all my
TM
> > experiences and understand it now.
> > >
> > > I am still learning some things about what has gone down with the
TMO
> > in years past and for my part I do not have the feeling it does me
any
> > good to hear all these things
> > > (like TMO reps pressing people to give $50,000 minimum payment for
a
> > Vedaland project the TMO knew was not going to be built AND using
films
> > of Doug Henning when they knew he was dying) and talk sweetness and
> > light about Marsh-hee and the TMO. The
> > > negativity you experience was and is created by Mar-ha-ree-shee
and
> > his organization. Myself and a few others here who speak about this
> > aren't the creators of the "negative" energy.
> > >
> > > As I have said before, if a man robs a bank and you call him a
robber
> > it isn't negativity. If a man masquerades as a spiritual leader
claiming
> > to have no interest in women, power and money and is a liar, a
> > womanizer, a money hungry self aggrandizing charlatan who needed his
> > title and picture on everything under the sun and someone describes
that
> > person and his organization in just that way, it isn't negative,
just
> > reporting the truth. But when such truth feels negative, maybe it is
> > bumping up against the illusions some hold about Maha being the
> > spiritual savior of Mother Earth.
> > >
> > > One never knows what a post here on FFL will bring forth from
others -
> > its always interesting!
> > >
> > > I read what everyone has said so far and I agree with Barry - why
not
> > discuss the
> > > incident itself - one reason I had such a reaction was I had never
> > heard of TMO deliberately soliciting rounding sidhas/governors to
make a
> > major financial decision while doing long term rounding - it surely
goes
> > against every rule of rounding I ever heard of.
> > >
> > > But perhaps I should appreciate the TMO and Marshy more fully -
maybe
> > they took and take the John Jones approach to heppin' people. John
Jones
> > is an undefeated UFC fighter (mixed martial arts) - I saw him today
in a
> > documentary about Bruce Lee - Jones said he feels like he is helping
> > people when he is hitting them in the face. He says that he is
helping
> > them by beating the weakness out of them and they are better people
for
> > the experience.
> > >
> > > So maybe Maharshy and his TMO felt that if they lied to and
scammed
> > people enough it would beat the innocence and gullibility out of us
-
> > worked for me! I am a better person!
> > >
> > > I realize I open myself up to untold charges of "negativity" by
> > > making such a comparison.
> > >
> > > Also, having read the Good Doctor's latest post, as for myself I
am
> > not fighting old battles, only commenting on what was and what is.
The
> > unknowing public of today need to and deserve to hear such stories
so
> > they will be prepared when David Lynch and his TMO buddies come
calling
> > with their toothy smiles.
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > ________________________________
> > > From: Share Long
> > > To: "FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com"
> > > Sent: Saturday, January 26, 2013 11:04 AM
> > > Subject: Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Co$ in the news again.....to
Michael
> > >
> > >
> > > Â
> > > Michael I'm fresh from the work of Paul Wong who comes from a
> > background of Chinese medicine and various energy modalities. I
> > think you practice a form of qigong. And still meditate
> > sometimes. And work with individuals with PTSD. With all
this
> > in mind I just want to say that I wish you substantial and even
complete
> > resolution of all traumatic experiences, whatever their origin.Â
I
> > think you and others here have an intention to be helpful when you
speak
> > negatively about the TMO. But when there's so much negativity
and
> > delivered with such a negatively charged tone, then I think there's
also
> > some healing yet to be done. And I don't think it's just about
the
> > TMO. But in a crucial sense, that doesn't even matter. What
> > matters is that those charges are in your body, in your brain
> > physiology, in your energy field. Hopefully from your own
> > experience you know what I mean. Anyway, FWIW. And you
> > probably already know this but as your charges
> > > are neutralized, to use Paul's word, all of your actions will be
more
> > effective, even those in relation to the TMO. I'm just sayin
> > (-:Â Â Â Â
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > ________________________________
> > > From: Michael Jackson
> > > To: "FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com"
> > > Sent: Saturday, January 26, 2013 8:16 AM
> > > Subject: Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Co$ in the news again.....
> > >
> > >
> > > Â
> > > as I do not believe in past or future lives I am good
> > >
> > >
> > > ________________________________
> > >
> >
>


Reply via email to