Life work of The holy. On Saintly Healing Maharishi says,
"That is `The department of the Almighty does it`. It is not the individual - it is the department. And it is only one way, it is not two ways. The help is not given, it is received. It is received by our ability to attune with that. And that ability develops with devotion, surrender and service. These three things - automatically one is elevated to that level. And help doesn`t come from outside, it comes from right were we are, from our own being. But those unaware of one`s own being have this mechanics to help them. And this is true for all the saints in all the times through out the world." > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Mike Dixon wrote: > > > > Paraphrasing Maharishi," a doctor doesn't need to be in good health to heal > > others". > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Buck" wrote: > > No, are looking at and talking about something else bigger here. Primary > care providers with a degree in medicine, even Chopra, are more usually just > different trades-people compared to saints. > > > > > --- In mailto:FairfieldLife%40yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" wrote: > > > > > > This is a good answer, Mike. > > > > > > I wouldn't want to have to define "holy man" or "saint," so > > > I wouldn't want to say what would disqualify him (or qualify > > > him, for that matter) for being either. He wasn't a perfect > > > human being, that's for sure. It's up to the individual to > > > decide how much they want to hold his sins against him. > > > > > > > > > > Couldn't describe? Saints? Okay, if you won't stick your neck out at this > > point I will for sake of the discussion here. We all know them when we see > > them. Saints become described by their work. As spiritual people our > > saints are those particular people who can help people spiritually and who > > distinguish their life work that way. More than just doing good works and > > different from folks [think Batgap.com] just being awake authors or > > spiritual teachers out on the circuit but those being in the work of > > tangibly lending spiritual transformation by interceding with healing for > > others of the binding influences in the subtle bodies of the spiritual > > psycho-physical and emotional samskara towards helping to free people of > > the binding influences in their spiritual life on earth. Real saints, it's > > those particular enlightened who can tangibly or manifestly heal people who > > are either afflicted or ignorant in their spiritual lives. > > -Buck > > > > > > > > --- In mailto:FairfieldLife%40yahoogroups.com, Mike Dixon wrote: > > > > > > > > Yeah, he's still a holy man, just not as holy as most of us thought. > > > > The Bible tells usÃÂ that all men fall short of the Glory of God. That > > > > means that all men have and will sin. Maharishi was a man, not God. The > > > > Bible also speaks of angels coming to earth and having sex with women. > > > > Veda Vyasa had sex with an unmarried woman in a boat while crossing a > > > > river, thus we have Shukadeva. Maharishi belongs on a pedestal, just > > > > not as high as we might have thought. My thoughts are that M was a very > > > > high soul on a mission and upon taking birth as a man, he did things > > > > men do. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ________________________________ > > > > From: Michael Jackson > > > > To: "mailto:FairfieldLife%40yahoogroups.com"; > > > > Sent: Sunday, February 3, 2013 12:58 PM > > > > Subject: [FairfieldLife] Serious Question > > > > > > > > ÃÂ > > > > > > > > OK, serious question here to all those who have defended Maharishi as a > > > > saint and true holy man. > > > > > > > > > > > > How do you account for the stories that several of his former skin boys > > > > have told about his sexual escapades? Mark Landau, Billy Clayton, Nedd > > > > Wynn and others have told stories that are very similar as to what who > > > > and when. > > > > > > > > Do you think they are all lying and if so why? Or do you honestly think > > > > it is alright for a true holy man who always said he was a lifelong > > > > celibate to have sex repeatedly and lie about having done so? > > > > > > > > > >
