LOSING face 
ABSOLUTELY FREE, NO CHARGE mnemonic device:
If the ring on your finger is too loose, it might slip off and you might lose 
it.  The ring that is, not the finger.  Probably.  


Also don't forget the rolling eyes along with Just consider if the TMO...

________________________________
 From: merudanda <no_re...@yahoogroups.com>
To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com 
Sent: Wednesday, February 6, 2013 12:39 PM
Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: Fascinating article that reveals much about Indian 
con men
 

  
 OMG
loosing face
forgot
my smiley face
should be :
"Papers are  retracted because of software errors (hopeful not done by 
Turquoisb)"......
of course
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, merudanda  wrote:
>
>  The problem seems to be more that although the number of scientific
> journals and articles published is increasing each year, the rate of
> papers being retracted as invalid is increasing even faster  and
> researchers like
 to portray their retractions as being the result of
> errors.
> Papers are  retracted because of software errors (hopeful not done by
> Turquoisb)and past studies (such as this one
> http://jme.bmj.com/content/early/2010/12/23/jme.2010.040923
>    )
> seems to verify this.
> But new studies find that this isn't the case. Many retractions (over 15
> percent by one measure) claim to be because of errors, but ultimately
> turn out to be because of fraud. You may easily discovered this by
> checking these reports prepared by the Office of Research Integrity,
> which polices research fraud.
> http://www.ori.dhhs.gov/ 
> Research fraud exploded over the last decade and retractions don't
> always mention when data are fraudulent (43% of the time, in fact).
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, doctordumbass@  wrote:
> >
> > Oh, that's right, you don't
 like Indians. Racism, like sexism, is an
> ugly trait, Barry. I recall several of your posts condemning the entire
> Indian subcontinent, because of some judgments you made about Indians in
> the US. Was Lenz a racist also??
> >
> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, turquoiseb  wrote:
> > >
> > > Few articles have captured the depths to which con men from
> > > India will stoop as this one does. I noticed it because one
> > > of my "hero" sites is RetractionWatch, an activist science
> > > site that follows dodgy research and blows the whistle on
> > > it and the researchers who perpetrate it when it turns out
> > > to be bogus.
> > >
> > > One of their most famous "takedowns" involves the case of
> > > Anil Potti, a cancer researcher who worked at Duke University
> > > and who
 published a number of seemingly ground-shaing studies
> > > that got him a lot of attention. As RetractionWatch and other
> > > orgs dug beneath the surface, however, the truth began to
> > > come out. He had faked most of his research data, and used
> > > any number of other unscrupulous means to make claims that
> > > simply weren't supported by any of his experiments. Major
> > > scandal followed, in which he was forced to resign from Duke,
> > > and during which his reputation pretty much went into the
> > > toilet. RetractionWatch themselves published something like
> > > 22 papers on him and his con games.
> > >
> > > So what does Anil Potti do? He hires himself an Indian PR
> > > firm named Online Reputation Manager to clean up his rep,
> > > and shortly afterwards, RetractionWatch notices
 that 10 of
> > > its articles on Potti have been taken down by their ISP
> > > provider, responding to DMCA Takedown Notices.
> > >
> > > What seems to have happened is that this "reputation manager"
> > > plagiarized RetractionWatch's original articles, put them
> > > up on a bogus site in India, and then sent off the retraction
> > > notices, claiming that RetractionWatch's *originals* violated
> > > their copyrights. The poor provider Wordpress, had no option
> > > but to comply to the takedown notices, and thus the articles
> > > exposing a total fraud and con man are no longer available.
> > >
> > > Welcome to science as it's practiced in the 21st century...
> > >
> > >
> http://arstechnica.com/science/2013/02/site-plagiarizes-blog-posts-then-\
>
 files-dmca-takedown-on-originals/
> > >
> >
>

 

Reply via email to