--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, doctordumbass@... wrote: > > You, and Raunchy have missed the point, sorry to say. :-( Barry has by his > own admission, moved waaaaaay beyond the sorry meditations and siddhi > techniques associated with Maharishi and the TMO. Even those professed by the > yogi mentioned in the original article. > > Barry can not only lock air behind his anus, he can *speak* with it. It was > this advanced siddhi that he hints to, with every post here, thinking > somewhat smugly to himself, "...you mortals must speak with your mouths, > while I, progeny of Rama, ONLY talk out of my ass...". > > Far from the airy fairy claims made by the TMO for example, with the > so-called "flying" siddhi, where nothing seems to materialize as described, > Barry can manifest the siddhi [of anal speech] at will. It is said by some of > his most ardent followers that this THE ONLY MEANS by which he communicates! > > So, take heed, we have a GREAT ONE in our midst. Though I personally would > like to see a bit more humility from so great a personage, I can better > understand the arrogance of Barry. Think of it, lost within a race of the > un-evolved, the dark, the ignorant, everyone speaking, using their (ugh) > LIPS, when Barry effortlessly speaks from his BUTT. >
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6DrRE1LDY_U > What a gap in evolution, between us commoners, and HIM. Deep Bow. > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" wrote: > > > > You can always tell when Barry has had his buttons > > pushed particularly effectively. There's a direct > > relationship between how upset he is and the > > incoherence of his response. This post is a perfect > > example. > > > > I made fun of the newspaper for having used the term > > "perennial" for "perianal," but Barry, demonstrating his > > desperate need for things to be All About Barry, > > interpreted this, somehow, to be an attack on *him*-- > > even though he had also made fun of the article. My > > comment had nothing whatsoever to do with Barry. > > > > Raunchy's hilarious take made fun of both the article > > and of Barry. His response did not, let us say, > > do anything to exemplify his frequently expressed > > contention that people should be able to laugh at > > themselves. > > > > Finally, Barry practically drowns in incoherence by > > suggesting that raunchy and I, as purportedly > > "wannabee Hindus," uncritically embrace Indian culture, > > and that this is why we made fun of the Indian > > newspaper--entirely oblivious to the contradiction. > > > > (Of course, Barry's brain goes even further in the toilet > > in his grateful response to navashok this morning for > > having, he assumes naively, shown him that what raunchy > > and I were ridiculing was an entirely proper and even > > intentional mangling of words. Pushing Barry's buttons > > is more than worth the effort for the amusement value. > > Good work, raunchy. ;-)) > > >
