--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" <authfriend@...> wrote: > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "seventhray27" <steve.sundur@> wrote: > > > > I'm sorry Judy, I don't see it. I see Share making a broad > > statement about treating people (in general) with respect. > > Yes, as Ravi said, there's nothing intelligent in your blind > support for her.
And maybe one day, perhaps in the afterlife, I will understand how you were able to decipher every nuance of Robin's discussions here such that, in every case he was found to be completely straighforward and without flaws in his interactions. And how those critics of his, were in every case misguided in their opinions. Yes, I will look forward to that quickening. with numerous people here such that in every case > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" <authfriend@> wrote: > > > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "seventhray27" <steve.sundur@> > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > yea, pretty weak to throw out an accusation like that on > > > > an internet forum and then to claim that since no said > > > > anything that the claim stands. > > > > > > I think he was making a more general observation here, > > > Steve, in the form of rhetorical questions. > > > > > > But we sure do see an example of what he's talking about > > > in Share's response to you. > > > > > > > > > > > > > either that, or just childish > > > > > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Share Long <sharelong60@> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > Thanks Steve, I appreciate the support by an individual. OTOH I > > > > > really don't want rallying around by any group, men or women, > > > > > especially if it means ganging up on someone. I find that cowardly > > > > > and despicable no matter who they're ganging up against. Just MHO > > > > > (-: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ________________________________ > > > > > From: seventhray27 <steve.sundur@> > > > > > To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com > > > > > Sent: Tuesday, February 19, 2013 6:35 PM > > > > > Subject: [FairfieldLife] Asstral [was Re: The Use of the Second > > > > > Attention, Pros and Cons] > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >  > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Ravi Chivukula wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > You have always needed some intelligent brain cells and > > > > > > unfortunately they don't grow around dead cells, tough luck Steve > > > > > > baby but I will always find my Devi if needed because I'm sure > > > > > > there are tons of women who don't need to insulate themselves into > > > > > > invulnerability with some elaborate, bizarre, delusional beliefs. > > > > > > Nothing remotely intelligent in your blind support for Share. > > > > > > > > > > At least nothing you would understand, in your incessant aggrandizing. > > > > > > > > > > > Seen any women here rally around Share? How about Obba? Emily? Ann? > > > > > > Judy? Oh wait what is this silence - goddammit someone say > > > > > > something. > > > > > > > > > > Oh Ravi, really. Is your reasoning so weak that you have to rely on > > > > > a fallacy of popular belief. I believe you are capable of better > > > > > that this. > > > > > > > > > > I think what is happening, and it was predicted, is that western > > > > > culture is still not a good fit for you. I suppose it must be > > > > > something similiar to "small man syndrome", that makes you feel you > > > > > need to dominate, when most others are content to just along, share, > > > > > and be happy. But you insist on being Ravi Yogi, the Great Telugu > > > > > Brahmin. Well, last time I looked, it did get you at least two > > > > > "likes" on your Facebook, so that's a start at least. > > > > > > > > > > > On Feb 19, 2013, at 3:30 PM, "seventhray27" wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > You need a real woman Ravi. This Devi crap ain't cutting it. > > > > > > > Either that or you're channeling Oscar Pistorius. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Ravi Chivukula wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Not clear enough, hmm.. - OK - I'm working on a sign for my door > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 1) Leave your fucking platitudes at the doorstep > > > > > > > > 2) Leave your inauthentic bullshit at the doorstep > > > > > > > > 3) Leave your delusional fantasies at the doorstep > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Which one do you think is better my beloved Auntie Share? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Tue, Feb 19, 2013 at 9:26 AM, Share Long wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ** > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I shall go forth dearest Ravi but only if we can go hand in > > > > > > > > > hand smiley > > > > > > > > > smile (-: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ------------------------------ > > > > > > > > > *From:* Ravi Chivukula > > > > > > > > > *To:* FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com > > > > > > > > > *Sent:* Tuesday, February 19, 2013 10:16 AM > > > > > > > > > *Subject:* Re: [FairfieldLife] Asstral [was Re: The Use of > > > > > > > > > the Second > > > > > > > > > Attention, Pros and Cons] > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > "The celestial realm is NOT the upper astral according to > > > > > > > > > them." > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Oh dear Share - with the above statement the automated > > > > > > > > > platitude detector > > > > > > > > > of FFL has recorded this as your 1 millionth platitude on > > > > > > > > > FFL. You are > > > > > > > > > hereby declared to be the avatar of Mother Saraswati. You no > > > > > > > > > longer need to > > > > > > > > > visit any healers, quantum light weavers - your weaknesses > > > > > > > > > have been > > > > > > > > > reduced to naught in one fell swoop, you have been totally > > > > > > > > > healed - no > > > > > > > > > longer you are one of the billions with positives and > > > > > > > > > negatives. Go forth > > > > > > > > > and start your own cult O' Wise lady. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Tue, Feb 19, 2013 at 7:26 AM, Share Long wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ** > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Doc, I appreciate what you say about astral being a > > > > > > > > > reflection of > > > > > > > > > consciousness. Want to add that 2 spiritual teachers I > > > > > > > > > respect a lot say > > > > > > > > > that there is a definite distinction between the celestial > > > > > > > > > and astral > > > > > > > > > realms. The celestial realm is NOT the upper astral according > > > > > > > > > to them. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ------------------------------ > > > > > > > > > *From:* "doctordumbass@" > > > > > > > > > *To:* FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com > > > > > > > > > *Sent:* Tuesday, February 19, 2013 9:05 AM > > > > > > > > > *Subject:* [FairfieldLife] Asstral [was Re: The Use of the > > > > > > > > > Second > > > > > > > > > Attention, Pros and Cons] > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Think of it this way - the astral world, meaning all of it, > > > > > > > > > parallels our > > > > > > > > > consciousness, like two thermometers, side by side, each > > > > > > > > > reading the same > > > > > > > > > thing. Astral is a higher vibration than physical. The sight > > > > > > > > > one gets from > > > > > > > > > practicing Patanjali's sutra, or by some other means like > > > > > > > > > peyote (ick) or > > > > > > > > > mescaline (ugh) or LSD (yuck), will bring you into that > > > > > > > > > world, according to > > > > > > > > > your level of consciousness at the time. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Those that experience unpleasant entities are merely seeing > > > > > > > > > the astral > > > > > > > > > manifestation of their consciousness. Astral means the entire > > > > > > > > > universe of > > > > > > > > > subtle sight. Of course, once a person is familiar with the > > > > > > > > > full scope of > > > > > > > > > Being in the astral world, one goes wherever one wants to - > > > > > > > > > Um, kinda like > > > > > > > > > in "real" life. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > However, it is important to note what one sees with each > > > > > > > > > exploration, most > > > > > > > > > of which will take a matter of seconds, popping in and out. > > > > > > > > > If the > > > > > > > > > consciousness is clean, it will naturally be experiencing the > > > > > > > > > Celestial > > > > > > > > > world, or I suppose, "upper astral". Also, the dynamics are > > > > > > > > > just like > > > > > > > > > anything else - with more experience, one has greater > > > > > > > > > discrimination, and > > > > > > > > > freedom of motion. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > If the reverse is true, (and one's consciousness is full of > > > > > > > > > "suspended > > > > > > > > > solids" - lol), and one forces one's way into the astral, > > > > > > > > > they will > > > > > > > > > probably see and meet lower entities. Not necessarily demons > > > > > > > > > and criminals, > > > > > > > > > but tricksters and manipulators. This is what is commonly > > > > > > > > > called "the > > > > > > > > > astral world" (by dopes like Lenz), but is actually a subset, > > > > > > > > > based on > > > > > > > > > limited access. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, doctordumbass@ wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Freebie from Doc: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > This word "astral" that you and Fred use, could be called > > > > > > > > > > "ass-tral" - > > > > > > > > > lol, because those that focus on the astral world, vs. > > > > > > > > > Celestial, have a > > > > > > > > > low consciousness. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Its like breaking into someone's basement, and really > > > > > > > > > > should be avoided > > > > > > > > > for all the trouble it causes. The horror movie makers seem > > > > > > > > > to profit, but > > > > > > > > > that's about it. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, turquoiseb wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Share Long wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Thanks for this. I've heard similar ideas from tantric > > > > > > > > > > > > teacher David Deida. Also I'm thinking that pushing it > > > > > > > > > > > > out opens one's aura to astral entities. True? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I doubt it. I would say, and I know that Rama did > > > > > > > > > > > say, that the thing that most opens one up to astral > > > > > > > > > > > entities is spending any time whatsoever thinking > > > > > > > > > > > about astral entities. What you focus on you become. > > > > > > > > > > (schnipp) > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
