Dear Share, you forgot the H. Love and light, Emily
>________________________________ > From: authfriend <authfri...@yahoo.com> >To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com >Sent: Wednesday, February 20, 2013 8:37 AM >Subject: [FairfieldLife] Asstral [was Re: The Use of the Second Attention, >Pros and Cons] > > > >--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Share Long wrote: >> >> Right. Like you're so objective. But what is very funny is >> your accusing me of not having the most active sense of >> humour. One, because I do and I express it often here. And >> two, because you don't. IMO. > >Let's just say there is no consensus here on either count. > >> >> >> >> >> ________________________________ >> From: Ann >> To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com >> Sent: Wednesday, February 20, 2013 9:02 AM >> Subject: [FairfieldLife] Asstral [was Re: The Use of the Second Attention, >> Pros and Cons] >> >> >>  >> >> >> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Share Long wrote: >> > >> > So Judy, any criticisms for Ravi's over the top post below? Right. >> > I thought not. Even though it was obviously way over the top. And >> > it is the one that prompted Steve to respond to Ravi. But right, focus >> > on Steve and me and our alleged wrong doings. Dredge up the past if >> > need be. But definitely ignore Ravi's extreme over reaction. So >> > much for friend's being able to speak frankly with each other. >> >> Each to our own opinion on Ravi's post. I found it rather humorous because >> it was typical of his style and the playfulness in it felt less than 'over >> the top' to me. But I have found that you don't have the most active sense >> of humour, especially when something is directed at you. You like to 'play' >> but only when it deflects or is a way for you to skirt around things. Still, >> you do have your supporter in Steve so that is nice for you. He is very >> staunch. >> > >> > >> > Judy to Ravi in Mission >> > Accomplished thread: >> > >> > Good enough, Ravi, thanks. We should all be able to >> > speak frankly to those we care about. >> > >> > >> > ________________________________ >> > From: Ravi Chivukula >> > To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com >> > Sent: Tuesday, February 19, 2013 12:57 PM >> > Subject: Re: [FairfieldLife] Asstral [was Re: The Use of the Second >> > Attention, Pros and Cons] >> > >> > >> >  >> > Not clear enough, hmm.. - OK - I'm working on a sign for my door >> > >> > 1) Leave your fucking platitudes at the doorstep >> > 2) Leave your inauthentic bullshit at the doorstep >> > 3) Leave your delusional fantasies at the doorstep >> > >> > Which one do you think is better my beloved Auntie Share? >> > >> > On Tue, Feb 19, 2013 at 9:26 AM, Share Long wrote: >> > >> > >> > > >> > >I shall go forth dearest Ravi but only if we can go hand in hand smiley >> > >smile (-: >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > >________________________________ >> > > From: Ravi Chivukula >> > >To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com >> > >Sent: Tuesday, February 19, 2013 10:16 AM >> > >Subject: Re: [FairfieldLife] Asstral [was Re: The Use of the Second >> > >Attention, Pros and Cons] >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > >"The celestial realm is NOT the upper astral according to them." >> > > >> > > >> > >Oh dear Share - with the above statement the automated platitude detector >> > >of FFL has recorded this as your 1 millionth platitude on FFL. You are >> > >hereby declared to be the avatar of Mother Saraswati. You no longer need >> > >to visit any healers, quantum light weavers - your weaknesses have been >> > >reduced to naught in one fell swoop, you have been totally healed - no >> > >longer you are one of the billions with positives and negatives. Go forth >> > >and start your own cult O' Wise lady. >> > > >> > >On Tue, Feb 19, 2013 at 7:26 AM, Share Long wrote: >> > > >> > > >> > >> >> > >>Doc, I appreciate what you say about astral being a reflection of >> > >>consciousness. Want to add that 2 spiritual teachers I respect a lot >> > >>say that there is a definite distinction between the celestial and >> > >>astral realms. The celestial realm is NOT the upper astral according >> > >>to them. >> > >> >> > >> >> > >> >> > >> >> > >> >> > >> >> > >>________________________________ >> > >> From: "doctordumbass@" >> > >>To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com >> > >>Sent: Tuesday, February 19, 2013 9:05 AM >> > >>Subject: [FairfieldLife] Asstral [was Re: The Use of the Second >> > >>Attention, Pros and Cons] >> > >> >> > >> >> > >> >> > >> >> > >>Think of it this way - the astral world, meaning all of it, parallels >> > >>our consciousness, like two thermometers, side by side, each reading the >> > >>same thing. Astral is a higher vibration than physical. The sight one >> > >>gets from practicing Patanjali's sutra, or by some other means like >> > >>peyote (ick) or mescaline (ugh) or LSD (yuck), will bring you into that >> > >>world, according to your level of consciousness at the time. >> > >> >> > >>Those that experience unpleasant entities are merely seeing the astral >> > >>manifestation of their consciousness. Astral means the entire universe >> > >>of subtle sight. Of course, once a person is familiar with the full >> > >>scope of Being in the astral world, one goes wherever one wants to - Um, >> > >>kinda like in "real" life. >> > >> >> > >>However, it is important to note what one sees with each exploration, >> > >>most of which will take a matter of seconds, popping in and out. If the >> > >>consciousness is clean, it will naturally be experiencing the Celestial >> > >>world, or I suppose, "upper astral". Also, the dynamics are just like >> > >>anything else - with more experience, one has greater discrimination, >> > >>and freedom of motion. >> > >> >> > >>If the reverse is true, (and one's consciousness is full of "suspended >> > >>solids" - lol), and one forces one's way into the astral, they will >> > >>probably see and meet lower entities. Not necessarily demons and >> > >>criminals, but tricksters and manipulators. This is what is commonly >> > >>called "the astral world" (by dopes like Lenz), but is actually a >> > >>subset, based on limited access. >> > >> >> > >>--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, doctordumbass@ wrote: >> > >>> >> > >>> Freebie from Doc: >> > >>> >> > >>> This word "astral" that you and Fred use, could be called "ass-tral" - >> > >>> lol, because those that focus on the astral world, vs. Celestial, have >> > >>> a low consciousness. >> > >>> >> > >>> Its like breaking into someone's basement, and really should be >> > >>> avoided for all the trouble it causes. The horror movie makers seem to >> > >>> profit, but that's about it. >> > >>> >> > >>> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, turquoiseb wrote: >> > >>> > >> > >>> > >> > >>> > >> > >>> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Share Long wrote: >> > >>> > > >> > >>> > > Thanks for this. I've heard similar ideas from tantric >> > >>> > > teacher David Deida. Also I'm thinking that pushing it >> > >>> > > out opens one's aura to astral entities. True? >> > >>> > >> > >>> > I doubt it. I would say, and I know that Rama did >> > >>> > say, that the thing that most opens one up to astral >> > >>> > entities is spending any time whatsoever thinking >> > >>> > about astral entities. What you focus on you become. >> > >>> (schnipp) >> > >>> >> > >> >> > >> >> > >> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > >> > > > > >
