--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Emily Reyn <emilymae.reyn@...> wrote: > > Dear Share, you forgot the H. Â Love and light, Emily
Crickey Em, glad you're back. This has was a tiny stroke of brilliance (and funny too.) > > > > >________________________________ > > From: authfriend <authfriend@...> > >To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com > >Sent: Wednesday, February 20, 2013 8:37 AM > >Subject: [FairfieldLife] Asstral [was Re: The Use of the Second Attention, > >Pros and Cons] > > > > > > > >--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Share Long wrote: > >> > >> Right. Like you're so objective. But what is very funny is > >> your accusing me of not having the most active sense of > >> humour. One, because I do and I express it often here. And > >> two, because you don't. IMO. > > > >Let's just say there is no consensus here on either count. > > > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> ________________________________ > >> From: Ann > >> To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com > >> Sent: Wednesday, February 20, 2013 9:02 AM > >> Subject: [FairfieldLife] Asstral [was Re: The Use of the Second Attention, > >> Pros and Cons] > >> > >> > >> à> >> > >> > >> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Share Long wrote: > >> > > >> > So Judy, any criticisms for Ravi's over the top post below?Ãâà> >> > Right.ÃâàI thought not.ÃâàEven though it was obviously way > >> > over the top.ÃâàAnd it is the one that prompted Steve to respond > >> > to Ravi.ÃâàBut right, focus on Steve and me and our alleged wrong > >> > doings.ÃâàDredge up the past if need be.ÃâàBut definitely > >> > ignore Ravi's extreme over reaction.ÃâàSo much for friend's being > >> > able to speak frankly with each other.Ãâà> >> > >> Each to our own opinion on Ravi's post. I found it rather humorous because > >> it was typical of his style and the playfulness in it felt less than 'over > >> the top' to me. But I have found that you don't have the most active sense > >> of humour, especially when something is directed at you. You like to > >> 'play' but only when it deflects or is a way for you to skirt around > >> things. Still, you do have your supporter in Steve so that is nice for > >> you. He is very staunch. > >> > > >> > > >> > Judy to Ravi in Mission > >> > Accomplished thread: > >> > > >> > Good enough, Ravi, thanks. We should all be able to > >> > speak frankly to those we care about. > >> > > >> > > >> > ________________________________ > >> > From: Ravi Chivukula > >> > To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com > >> > Sent: Tuesday, February 19, 2013 12:57 PM > >> > Subject: Re: [FairfieldLife] Asstral [was Re: The Use of the Second > >> > Attention, Pros and Cons] > >> > > >> > > >> > Ãâà> >> > Not clear enough, hmm.. - OK - I'm working on a sign for my door > >> > > >> > 1) Leave your fucking platitudes at the doorstep > >> > 2) Leave your inauthentic bullshit at the doorstep > >> > 3) Leave your delusional fantasies at the doorstep > >> > > >> > Which one do you think is better my beloved Auntie Share? > >> > > >> > On Tue, Feb 19, 2013 at 9:26 AM, Share Long wrote: > >> > > >> > > >> > >Ãâà> >> > >I shall go forth dearest Ravi but only if we can go hand in hand smiley > >> > >smile (-: > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > >________________________________ > >> > > From: Ravi Chivukula > >> > >To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com > >> > >Sent: Tuesday, February 19, 2013 10:16 AM > >> > >Subject: Re: [FairfieldLife] Asstral [was Re: The Use of the Second > >> > >Attention, Pros and Cons] > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > >Ãâà> >> > >"The celestial realm is NOT the upper astral according to them." > >> > > > >> > > > >> > >Oh dear Share - with the above statement the automated platitude > >> > >detector of FFL has recorded this as your 1 millionth platitude on FFL. > >> > >You are hereby declared to be the avatar of Mother Saraswati. You no > >> > >longer need to visit any healers, quantum light weavers - your > >> > >weaknesses have been reduced to naught in one fell swoop, you have been > >> > >totally healed - no longer you are one of the billions with positives > >> > >and negatives. Go forth and start your own cult O' Wise lady. > >> > > > >> > >On Tue, Feb 19, 2013 at 7:26 AM, Share Long wrote: > >> > > > >> > > > >> > >>Ãâà> >> > >>Doc, I appreciate what you say about astral being a reflection of > >> > >>consciousness.ÃâàWant to add that 2 spiritual teachers I > >> > >>respect a lot say that there is a definite distinction between the > >> > >>celestial and astral realms.ÃâàThe celestial realm is NOT the > >> > >>upper astral according to them. > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >>________________________________ > >> > >> From: "doctordumbass@" > >> > >>To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com > >> > >>Sent: Tuesday, February 19, 2013 9:05 AM > >> > >>Subject: [FairfieldLife] Asstral [was Re: The Use of the Second > >> > >>Attention, Pros and Cons] > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >>Ãâà> >> > >>Think of it this way - the astral world, meaning all of it, parallels > >> > >>our consciousness, like two thermometers, side by side, each reading > >> > >>the same thing. Astral is a higher vibration than physical. The sight > >> > >>one gets from practicing Patanjali's sutra, or by some other means > >> > >>like peyote (ick) or mescaline (ugh) or LSD (yuck), will bring you > >> > >>into that world, according to your level of consciousness at the time. > >> > >> > >> > >>Those that experience unpleasant entities are merely seeing the astral > >> > >>manifestation of their consciousness. Astral means the entire universe > >> > >>of subtle sight. Of course, once a person is familiar with the full > >> > >>scope of Being in the astral world, one goes wherever one wants to - > >> > >>Um, kinda like in "real" life. > >> > >> > >> > >>However, it is important to note what one sees with each exploration, > >> > >>most of which will take a matter of seconds, popping in and out. If > >> > >>the consciousness is clean, it will naturally be experiencing the > >> > >>Celestial world, or I suppose, "upper astral". Also, the dynamics are > >> > >>just like anything else - with more experience, one has greater > >> > >>discrimination, and freedom of motion. > >> > >> > >> > >>If the reverse is true, (and one's consciousness is full of "suspended > >> > >>solids" - lol), and one forces one's way into the astral, they will > >> > >>probably see and meet lower entities. Not necessarily demons and > >> > >>criminals, but tricksters and manipulators. This is what is commonly > >> > >>called "the astral world" (by dopes like Lenz), but is actually a > >> > >>subset, based on limited access. > >> > >> > >> > >>--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, doctordumbass@ wrote: > >> > >>> > >> > >>> Freebie from Doc: > >> > >>> > >> > >>> This word "astral" that you and Fred use, could be called "ass-tral" > >> > >>> - lol, because those that focus on the astral world, vs. Celestial, > >> > >>> have a low consciousness. > >> > >>> > >> > >>> Its like breaking into someone's basement, and really should be > >> > >>> avoided for all the trouble it causes. The horror movie makers seem > >> > >>> to profit, but that's about it. > >> > >>> > >> > >>> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, turquoiseb wrote: > >> > >>> > > >> > >>> > > >> > >>> > > >> > >>> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Share Long wrote: > >> > >>> > > > >> > >>> > > Thanks for this. I've heard similar ideas from tantric > >> > >>> > > teacher David Deida. Also I'm thinking that pushing it > >> > >>> > > out opens one's aura to astral entities. True? > >> > >>> > > >> > >>> > I doubt it. I would say, and I know that Rama did > >> > >>> > say, that the thing that most opens one up to astral > >> > >>> > entities is spending any time whatsoever thinking > >> > >>> > about astral entities. What you focus on you become. > >> > >>> (schnipp) > >> > >>> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > >> > > > > > > > > > > >
