Let's assume you're correct, although I don't think you are. They why do you object to people being free to take a job or not, depending on what they're offered?
If not enough is offered, the rebuilding won't happen. If enough is offered, it will. I do not understand your objection at all. --- In [email protected], "sparaig" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > --- In [email protected], "Cliff" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > > It allows people to be employed who won't have ANY job if high > minimum- > > wage guidelines are enforced. This will be particularly helpful in > getting > > teenagers or early-20s people who have little skills back to at > least some > > useful work. > > > > No teenagers or low-skill workers are going to be involved in > rebuilding a disaster-area. You need your very best to handle the > demands. I mean, they're going to be buildingin a contaminated swamp > where living quarters will likely be miles from theworksite. you > don't do OJT in emergency conditions. > > > > I think it's a great move, and I believe I understand the economics > behind > > it. Is it possible that you oppose it simply because Bush proposed > it? > > Is it possible you've missed that this is a disaster relief and > rebuilding effort, not a $500 million pork-bridge in Alaska? ------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor --------------------~--> Get fast access to your favorite Yahoo! Groups. Make Yahoo! your home page http://us.click.yahoo.com/dpRU5A/wUILAA/yQLSAA/JjtolB/TM --------------------------------------------------------------------~-> To subscribe, send a message to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Or go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/ and click 'Join This Group!' Yahoo! Groups Links <*> To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/ <*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
