--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Emily Reyn <emilymae.reyn@...> wrote:
>
> Goodness Judy, that's twice you've been wrong in the recent past. > Smiley 
> face.

Ain't it awful? If I'm to maintain my average, it means
I can't be wrong again for another two years. )-:
 



> >________________________________
> > From: authfriend <authfriend@...>
> >To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com 
> >Sent: Sunday, February 24, 2013 11:42 AM
> >Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: David Lynch Is Back to Emily
> > 
> >
> >  
> >--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Emily Reyn  wrote:
> >>
> >> Just a figure of speech, conversational, if I really "hated
> >> to say it," I wouldn't have said it. Smile.
> >
> >I'm wrong again. "Figure of speech" would have been my
> >second wild guess, though. ;-)
> >
> >> > From: Share Long 
> >> >To: "FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com" FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com> 
> >> >Sent: Sunday, February 24, 2013 11:24 AM
> >> >Subject: Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: David Lynch Is Back to Emily
> >> > 
> >> >
> >> >  
> >> >Emily, what is it you hate to say?  And why?
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >________________________________
> >> > From: Emily Reyn 
> >> >To: "FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com" FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com> 
> >> >Sent: Sunday, February 24, 2013 1:01 PM
> >> >Subject: Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: David Lynch Is Back
> >> > 
> >> >
> >> >  
> >> >I read it and the comments last night; hate to say, but leaving Maharishi 
> >> >and the TMO out, benefits from TM come across.  
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >>________________________________
> >> >> From: Michael Jackson 
> >> >>To: "FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com" FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com> 
> >> >>Sent: Sunday, February 24, 2013 10:51 AM
> >> >>Subject: Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: David Lynch Is Back
> >> >> 
> >> >>
> >> >>  
> >> >>Oh by the way, why not go visit the New York Times magazine article on 
> >> >>Raja David and his band of con artists again and see how many post there 
> >> >>are.
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >>________________________________
> >> >> From: authfriend 
> >> >>To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com 
> >> >>Sent: Sunday, February 24, 2013 11:10 AM
> >> >>Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: David Lynch Is Back
> >> >> 
> >> >>
> >> >>  
> >> >>--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Xenophaneros Anartaxius"  wrote:
> >> >>>
> >> >>> While I do not want to get into this particular sparring match
> >> >>> between MJ and JS about whether TM is a devotional practice or
> >> >>> not,
> >> >>
> >> >>What Michael and I are actually "sparring" about is
> >> >>Michael's unwillingness--or inability--to address the
> >> >>case emptybill made that TM is not a devotional
> >> >>practice.
> >> >>
> >> >>> the following link points to a few pages of Maharishi's Theory
> >> >>> of Spiritual development from 1955, which is the earliest
> >> >>> document I know of that describes his system of meditation.
> >> >>
> >> >>Actually the link doesn't "point to" anything. It doesn't
> >> >>work (HTTP 404).
> >> >>
> >> >>> This is a PDF document, an excerpt from 'Beacon Light of the 
> >> >>> Himalayas'.
> >> >>
> >> >>And I'll just bet it's the excerpt in which Maharishi says:
> >> >>
> >> >>"...We find that any sound can serve our purpose of training the
> >> >>mind to become sharp. But we do not select any sound like 'mike',
> >> >>flower, table, pen, wall etc. because such ordinary sounds can
> >> >>do nothing more than merely sharpening the mind; whereas there
> >> >>are some special sounds which have the additional efficacy of
> >> >>producing vibrations whose effects are found to be congenial
> >> >>to our way of life. This is the scientific reason why we do not
> >> >>select any word at random. For our practice we select only the
> >> >>suitable mantras of personal Gods. Such mantras fetch to us the
> >> >>grace of personal Gods and make us happier in every walk of
> >> >>life."
> >> >>
> >> >>Right?
> >> >>
> >> >>> Because the TMO did not exist then, and this was published without a 
> >> >>> copyright, I will assume it is in the public domain.
> >> >>> 
> >> >>> http://bit.ly/YQmNKW
> >> >>>
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > 
> >> >
> >> >
> >>
> >
> >
> > 
> >
> >
>


Reply via email to