Evolution should be visible. Is that true? Can you absolutely know that's true? Questions from Byron Katie's The Work. And about YF: I don't think it involves breaking the law of gravity. I think it involves accessing a deeper law of laws that are yet to be discovered and or articulated. This is my best guess.
Back to the evolution question: IMO it doesn't matter if they're evolved or not. If I don't like how they're treating me, I will go elsewhere. ________________________________ From: salyavin808 <fintlewoodle...@mail.com> To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com Sent: Wednesday, March 6, 2013 2:37 PM Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: To card - mUrdhajyothiShi --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Sharalyn" wrote: > > Why shoot the messenger? The TMO is not responsible for my personal > experiences of significant benefits gained from the practice of TM. If my own > direct experience has been positive, why should I judge the results I've had > any differently just because a small select group behaves in ways I don't > like? > > The TMO has one major responsibility: to protect the purity of the teachings. > If they seem fundamentalistic or underdeveloped, it is none of our business > because the TMO is a force of nature set into motion by Maharishi, intended > for this purpose, and that purpose is greater than any of us can fully > appreciate. But just like us as individuals, the individuals in it are > imperfect; they and the organization must evolve just as we do. Shouldn't evolution be visible? > > "how anyone can continue to praise TM while seeing and experiencing the > > behavior of the TMO people is beyond me". > > > > >
