On Sat, Mar 9, 2013 at 9:31 PM, seventhray27 <steve.sun...@yahoo.com> wrote:

> **
>
>
> I'm turning in Ravi.  Hope you have a good nights sleep (-:
>

Thank you dear Steve, love you.


>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Ravi Chivukula <chivukula.ravi@...>
> wrote:
> >
> > On Mar 9, 2013, at 9:20 PM, "seventhray27" steve.sundur@... wrote:
> >
> > > Not at all Ravi.
> > >
> >
> > Of course you are !!!
> >
> > > It's just that when you take an aggressvie tone with people, either
> because you're just that "playful", or "enlightened", or just wanting to
> "push people's buttons", then people can do the same right back at you,
> maybe because they're "stupid",or "ignorant", or "can't take a joke".
> Perhaps that is how you would look at it. Or at least that is how you
> generally refer to me.
> > >
> > >
> > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Ravi Chivukula chivukula.ravi@wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Are you serious dear Steve? You trying to argue with me? Just for
> argument's sake?
> > > >
> > > > On Mar 9, 2013, at 9:05 PM, "seventhray27" steve.sundur@ wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > Ravi, just let me know if you wish to look at some examples of
> what an idiot truly is. I will be more than happy to provide such examples
> from your own public postings here. Is this something you'd like to compare
> and contrast?
> > > > >
> > > > > Just let me know, and I promise I'll keep it on the level.
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Ravi Chivukula
> chivukula.ravi@ wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > On Mar 9, 2013, at 8:51 PM, "seventhray27" steve.sundur@ wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Ravi Chivukula
> chivukula.ravi@ wrote:
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > On Mar 9, 2013, at 8:22 PM, "authfriend" authfriend@ wrote:
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "seventhray27"
> steve.sundur@ wrote:
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > Judy, I'm afraid you are not making a lot of sense.
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Of course you are!
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > LOL..a very strategy to deal with this idiot.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Of course you are!
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > You lost it, I am what? Hard to believe you are a native
> speaker. Now I extend this privilege of calling you an idiot for the rest
> of eternity..LOL
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend"
> <authfriend@>
> > > > > > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,
> "curtisdeltablues"
> > > > > > > > > > curtisdeltablues@ wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > -- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend"
> <authfriend@>
> > > > > > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,
> "curtisdeltablues"
> > > > > > > > > > <curtisdeltablues@> wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,
> "authfriend" <authfriend@>
> > > > > > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Yeah, I don't think this covers the comparison
> with cocaine
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > and gambling. That goes beyond just being
> honest about your
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > own POV.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > The reward centers of our brains do not make the
> value
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > judgements about what triggers the endorphins.
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > Duh. Right, you do that.
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > My point is that it happens on another level of the
> brain.
> > > > > > > > > > > > You were accusing me of making a comparison between
> TM and
> > > > > > > > > > > > drugs and gambling but it was on the wrong brain
> functioning
> > > > > > > > > > > > level. I am talking about an area of the brain where
> they
> > > > > > > > > > > > are more similar in effect.
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > And I'm talking about word choice. But you knew that.
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > My point concerns the content free reward system
> itself.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > And since I spent a lot of time being fulltime I
> saw a
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > lot of people whose lives were a wreck from
> their fixation
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > on meditation. Later after I got out I spent
> time with
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > families who had been torn apart by their kids
> over-
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > involvement and inability to support themselves.
> So the
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > comparisons with other activities that can
> incapacitate
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > people due to an uncontrollable urge like for
> rounding
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > courses is not without some basis in my
> experience.
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > I didn't say it never happened. Of course it does.
> But I
> > > > > > > > > > > > > don't believe--I'd have to be shown hard evidence
> to the
> > > > > > > > > > > > > contrary--that it's common among TMers generally.
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > Like I said , what is most common among TMers is
> that they
> > > > > > > > > > > > quit TM and I know this for a fact.
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > Non sequitur, since we're talking about people who
> > > > > > > > > > > practice TM.
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > You said it yourself: you were/are the type of
> person who
> > > > > > > > > > > > > does get addicted, and you chose to spend time in
> an
> > > > > > > > > > > > > environment that catered to that addiction, with
> others
> > > > > > > > > > > > > who were likely to be vulnerable to it as well.
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > I was the type of person who had really charming
> experiences
> > > > > > > > > > > > in meditation. It was the goal of the practice to
> have the
> > > > > > > > > > > > experiences I was having.
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > That must have been one of the "secret teachings" not
> > > > > > > > > > > divulged to the hoi polloi.
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > In my experience the more charming, the more
> addictive.
> > > > > > > > > > > > But this is content free positive experience
> divorced from
> > > > > > > > > > > > achievement. I am calling into question the whole
> goal of
> > > > > > > > > > > > the yoga systems including TM.
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > Well, including TM for those privy to the "secret
> > > > > > > > > > > teachings," but not including TM for the ordinary TMer,
> > > > > > > > > > > who, in my experience, was told most emphatically that
> > > > > > > > > > > the value of TM was one's experience in activity, not
> > > > > > > > > > > one's experience during meditation.
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > I think it behooves you to make this very clear
> when you
> > > > > > > > > > > > > deliver your POV, especially when you're talking
> to someone
> > > > > > > > > > > > > who is unlikely to be able to figure it out on his
> or her
> > > > > > > > > > > > > own.
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > So you think Emily was confused that I am always
> > > > > > > > > > > > expressing my own POV when I post here? I'll give her
> > > > > > > > > > > > a bit more credit.
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > Oh, please, Curtis, you don't limit yourself to your
> own
> > > > > > > > > > > POV here, including in this exchange. Just for one
> example,
> > > > > > > > > > > above you write, "It was the goal of the practice to
> have
> > > > > > > > > > > the experiences I was having." And you refer to what
> you're
> > > > > > > > > > > questioning as "the whole goal of the yoga systems
> including
> > > > > > > > > > > TM." Those are statements made as if of established
> fact. And
> > > > > > > > > > > they may *be* established fact. My point is that you
> make
> > > > > > > > > > > factual statements as well as POV statements, but some
> of
> > > > > > > > > > > your POV statements are indistinguishable from your
> factual
> > > > > > > > > > > statements.
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > This is not a matter of PR. This is a matter of
> doing
> > > > > > > > > > > > > one's best not to mislead people.
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > And how many times in a personal opinion post on an
> opinion
> > > > > > > > > > > > forum should I make this disclaimer to avoid being
> accused
> > > > > > > > > > > > of misleading people?
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > Shouldn't you be doing this too?
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > Yes, we all should. Again, though, my point is that
> when
> > > > > > > > > > > you make a post that includes factual statements and
> POV
> > > > > > > > > > > statements *and* statements made as if they were
> factual
> > > > > > > > > > > that are really POV statements, readers can easily be
> > > > > > > > > > > confused, especially if they aren't practitioners.
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > Hear ye hear ye, from now on, if you see any post of
> mine
> > > > > > > > > > > > here on FFL, it represents my own POV on any topic.
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > I'll assume that this covers it once and for all.
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > Let's see what happens in your future posts, shall we?
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > Reply via web post Reply to sender Reply to group Start a New
> Topic Messages in this topic (100)
> > > > > RECENT ACTIVITY: New Members 4
> > > > > Visit Your Group
> > > > > To subscribe, send a message to:
> > > > > fairfieldlife-subscr...@yahoogroups.com
> > > > >
> > > > > Or go to:
> > > > > http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
> > > > > and click 'Join This Group!'
> > > > > Switch to: Text-Only, Daily Digest • Unsubscribe • Terms of
> Use •
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> >
>
>  
>

Reply via email to