On Thu, Mar 14, 2013 at 10:04 AM, curtisdeltablues < curtisdeltabl...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> ** > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wleed3 <WLeed3@...> wrote: > > > > Suspension till case is adjudicated or settled in some manor!!! All are > & stand innocent in law, till proven, in law or other wise! > > I hear this invoked a lot and can appreciate that until we have the facts > we don't know what went on as I said in my post about this. > > But the legal standards of judging cases really has little to do with how > we judge things in our daily life. (I don't even know if what the legal > standard in India is, do you?) Throw in the very dubious influence peddling > in India by the rich and powerful and it is probably unrealistic to expect > us not to weigh in as the statements are published about what went on, to > form opinions as best we can with what we know. I mean are you expressing > faith that an Indian justice system (or ours for that matter) will deal > impartially with a rich guy like Girish who has probably cultivated many > powerfully alliances. Remember how well connected Sai Baba was. that > basically made him untouchable. > > Settled in law doesn't mean guilty or innocent to me. OJ got off remember. > But he did it. > Yes - of course. What I would be interested is your experiences around this topic as a teacher in the TM cult. Surely it was just not the Gurus - I'm sure you teachers got a piece of the pie sometimes too yeah - smiley, wink, wink, smiley. Of course you may completely ignore my question and address it from the perspective of the epistemological purity of neuroscience - if so I totally understand - smiley, wink, wink, smiley.
