Should that have been, "the wannabe-artist who thinks he's a negro"??
Quick, so who's worse, Mr. Bleeding Heart: 1) A guy who says he is enlightened, but you believe is not. 2) A guy who calls you a negro. 3) A guy who thinks of women as cunts and bitches when they disagree with him. Obviously #1 and 2, right? --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "curtisdeltablues" <curtisdeltablues@...> wrote: > > - In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, nablusoss1008 <no_reply@> wrote: > > <the wannabe-negro who thinks he's an artist> > <the wannabe-negro who thinks he's an artist> plus a million more times > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "PaliGap" <compost1uk@> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, nablusoss1008 <no_reply@> wrote: > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, navashok <no_reply@> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > If I may say something more esoteric here, for me Judy is still a > > > > > young soul, despite of the age of her physical body. There will be > > > > > always a conflict with older souls here, who draw from a wider field > > > > > of experience and thinking, who have come a longer way, and that > > > > > manifests usually early on in this life. > > > > > > > > > > > > If it wasn't a sad and arrogant statement from the above I'd say it > > > > will qualify for: JOKE of week ! > > > > > > No, no, no. get it right Nabby. BOLLOCKS of the week. Jeez, talk > > > about "self-aggrandisement"... > > > > > > > > With opponents like navashok, the neurotic ex-pat and the wannabe-negro who > > thinks he's an artist, Judy hasn't much serious work to do these days. > > > > > > > > > > Then again, this is quite common in debate these days, no? You > > > don't just *disagree* with someone. You also wheel in some pseudo- > > > crappy theory about WHY they disagree with you. e.g. The wrong > > > bits of the brain "light up", or they are in "denial", etc etc. > > > It's a nice short cut to avoid dealing with the very messy > > > nitty-gritty of logic, argument and evidence. > > > > > > PaliGap's Thought-de-Jour: Treat with great suspicion anyone > > > who uses the word "brain" when any perfectly serviceable English > > > word such as "me" or "mind" is available to do the job at hand. > > > > > > And also watch out for the word "epistemology". It does NOT mean > > > "how we justify belief" (Karl Popper would be rotating in his > > > grave at a rate of knots). It means the "theory of knowledge" > > > (as Emily correctly ascertained). > > > > > > Just sayin' > > > > > > BTW Is Virish (or whatever his name is) "guilty until proved > > > innocent"? I say this as someone who whilst once running a > > > small organisation, got accused of "sexual harrassment" > > > myself. It's not nice. In my case the biddy was a nutter, we > > > were not in the public eye, and it came to nothing. > > > > > > At least that's my story! > > > > > >
