--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Share Long <sharelong60@...> wrote: > > dear Buck, I find I cannot quite grasp what is meant > by "extraordinary times of community need" in the FFL > context. Did such times occur in the past?
Posting limits were lifted (for a couple weeks, as I recall) when Maharishi died. Not too hard to grasp, I don't think. > Something biblical perhaps? Biblical?? > Who would determine that such times were upon us? Rick, of course. > And could such determination be made without undue pressure > on any one individual? Speak! I have no idea what that means. Maybe Buck will. > From: Buck <dhamiltony2k5@...> > To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com > Sent: Monday, March 18, 2013 5:23 PM > Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: FFL Post Count. > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Alex Stanley" <j_alexander_stanley@> > wrote: > > > > Curtis did, in fact, overpost, but that's because he kept getting an error > > on the website while trying to send his 50th post. Curtis emailed me, and I > > sent it on to Rick for him to pass judgment from upon high. Rick let him > > slide. > > > > > > Point of order, spare the rod spoil the writer. > 50 posts per week is way more than enough to say what needs to be said. What > is anyone saying even with coming close to 50 posts that they couldn't say > more judiciously in 30 posts per week? The lack of civility that is endemic > too often in posting here is only helped along with the lack of severity in > administering the community guidelines. We should all be better here with a > 30 post limit exept in extraordinary times of community need. > Sincerely, > -Buck