right....does the bollocks diagram contain itself in which case we enounter a paradox. The way to effectively evade the paradox is to call a Venn diagram of "everything...relative and Absolute"; the "Class of All Sets". The mathematician Cantor came up with a mathematical equivalency. Label the Class of All Sets E. Conceptualize "Infinity" and the infinite set of all Infinities. Conceptualize such an infinite set of Infinite Sets but include the transcendental Absolute; labeling this "OMEGA". (O). Now "O" includes anything relative and Absolute, as well as finite. Finally, .... E = O. The Class of All Sets is identical to the Infinite Absolute. For Omega, we can substitute the word "Brahman". ... Corollary: Brahman is holographic and can be depicted by the Gohonzon. (mandala). http://nichirenscoffeehouse.net/GohonzonShu/index.html
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "PaliGap" <compost1uk@...> wrote: > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Ravi Chivukula <chivukula.ravi@> wrote: > > > > Well stated Richard - that's the first thing i thought when I saw the Venn > > diagram, the Venn diagram wouldn't be complete without the Scientism > > bollocks and the Venn diagram itself. > > (Sharp intake of breath) - What a thought Ravi! (Whose > wee, little toe nail I am not fit to clip). Should that > Venn diagram contain itself as a member? > > If a Venn diagram of bollocks items were to contain > itself within itself, it would be expressing something > true (that the diagram is bollocks). In which case it > would NOT be bollocks and would have to "snap" to a reality > outside the diagram to avoid a paradox. But then... > (rinse & repeat). > > Is the set of all sets that are not members of themselves > a member of itself? > > Duz me 'ead in. Mmmm... A nice feeling. Zennnnnnnnnnnn. >
