--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Ann" <awoelflebater@...> wrote:
>
> 
> 
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, turquoiseb <no_reply@> wrote:
> >
> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "curtisdeltablues" 
> > <curtisdeltablues@> wrote:
> > >
> > > I was going to second Steve's post but I guess I would rather address you 
> > > directly Robin since I am so tight with "reality" that if she dies 
> > > tonight on the car ride home CSI would convict me on DNA evidence alone.
> > > 
> > > From the outset your mission with Share has been unfriendly and she has 
> > > done a pretty good job of handling herself considering that you are just 
> > > letting her have it with both barrels about herself, uninvited.  It 
> > > reminds me of our conversations which followed the same arc, although I 
> > > at lest got some flowers and chocolates at the door before the assault. 
> > > 
> > > "You would make Share's post into some devastating counterpunch."
> > > 
> > > You have used similar metaphors of competition in our conversations and I 
> > > am seeing a pattern. The issue is that you seem to believe, perhaps 
> > > sincerely, that you have a better insight into some posters here than 
> > > they do of themselves.  And when they reject this assumption, (as any 
> > > adult would), you act as if you are in a fight to make them see 
> > > themselves through your unflattering lens.
> > > 
> > > Why would we? You may be thinking that your "insight" is more valuable 
> > > than it is.  And having been the focus of your unasked for improvement 
> > > sessions myself, I have to say that you aren't that perceptive Robin. And 
> > > perhaps you are in person, so you have developed an unnaturally high 
> > > self-regard about this ability, but it isn't cutting it here.  You have 
> > > been running a formula and it is increasingly obvious.
> > > 
> > > So that is my opinion and I don't need to word flood you about it or 
> > > repeat it a million times.  I've made my point and as a fellow adult I 
> > > suspect you will just blow it all off as me being me.
> > 
> > Me, I'm gonna stick with my three-word description of
> > the guy, which I think explains it all, and in the
> > least possible number of words: Narcissistic Personality
> > Disorder, in spades. OK, that was five words. :-)
> > 
> > People here must be really, Really, REALLY masochistic
> > to put up with this kinda abuse by continuing to read
> > and respond to this asshole's crap. My suggestion is 
> > that people would have to shower less if they just 
> > ignored him like the pisshole in otherwise new and 
> > pristine snow he is.
> 
> A few things I will give you Barry:
> You are very, very consistent
> Your words bludgeon, they never, ever caress
> Whatever it is you manage to do when you write you repel as opposed to draw 
> people 
> You reduce things to the lowest common denominator 
> You would have made a terrible surgeon
> You would have never made a ballet dance

Ha! Funny how a typo comes out better than what I actually meant. I thought I 
wanted an 'r' after 'dance' but it is better like it is.

> Your repertoire needs an overhaul
> 
> 
> >
>


Reply via email to