--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Share Long <sharelong60@...> wrote: > > [SHARE]ality #1: I was replying to turq, not to Curtis.
Oh, dear, Share, that's a very bad start. You were responding to a post of Barry's *in which he quoted Curtis*, so you were aware of what Curtis had said and thought you'd help him out by supporting it. > [SHARE]ality #2: I don't know what it means when you put the word > check between asterisks. And this puts you even further back. You've encountered this convention over and over on FFL and never had any difficulty understanding what it meant. > [SHARE]ality #3: I don't equate checking archives with a > willingness to find reality. No, I don't imagine you would. You'd rather go with the SHAREality you make up in your head, even when it's contradicted by the actual reality of what's in the archives. Or *especially* when it's contradicted by what's in the archives. > From: authfriend <authfriend@...> > To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com > Sent: Saturday, April 13, 2013 1:05 PM > Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: parsing a la Descartes was HITLER'S VALENTINE > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Share Long <sharelong60@> wrote: > > > > What I remember is that Robin initially posted a one big > > paragraph post but then added paragraph breaks after people > > requested that. > > No, you'd be "remembering" incorrectly. Not a good idea > to assume Curtis's remarks about Robin are reliable, > especially those he makes when Robin isn't around. > > It's not difficult to *check* these things, you know. > Finding Robin's initial posts in the archive takes about > 30 seconds and requires no technical skill, just the > will to find out what the reality is.
