--- In [email protected], "Ann" wrote:
> Happy Birthday Steve. Thank you for your acknowledgement of my post. Did you want to corroborate any of your assertions you made or just let it lie as is? Do you still feel the same way you did before I responded to you and if so why not show me some evidence of "getting nasty" with LK or any other archival "proof" of your assertions. Or, we can just move on - your choice. Hi Ann, Good morning! Thank you for my birthday acknowledgement. Since we just heard from Raunchy a moment ago, there was an event sometime ago, where it was debated whether Ranchy owed, or did not owe, Sunshine Sal an apology for something. And of course no resolution was reached, and it went on for days and days. So, no Ann, I really don't care to revisit those posts during the time we heard from LK and others. If I have been mistaken in my analysis, then I apologize, but from my side, I don't see any point in bringing those issues up again and trying to make a determination about them. There was some kind of interaction between you and LK, and I characterized it as becoming nasty. Perhaps that was too strong a word. But yes, I stand by the overall points I made in my post. Probably, they could stand some tweaking, but there is nothing I would care to retract.
