Please don't humiliate yourself with your frivolous, careless, reactive posts - day in and day out. How shameless, clueless, brainless can you be - is there a bottom that you can hit or is this a bottomless pit you are in?
Take another shot at it, take your time, there's no hurry, I will give my complete attention to it, I promise. Come up with something that has a morsel of dignity and intelligence - anything - some creative insult, insight, irony. Please I beg you - give me something Steve baby. On Thu, Apr 25, 2013 at 8:25 PM, seventhray27 <steve.sun...@yahoo.com>wrote: > ** > > > You are vomiting Ravi. You might want to try the toilet. They should have > a nice one where you work. Or at least tomorrow, if it should come up > again. > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Ravi Chivukula wrote: > > > > Sorry dear Share we all got distracted by your stalking err searching > for Sal. > > > > Considering your disability I have made this real easy for you. Please > feel free to take the help of the idiots Feste and Steve. > > > > Your post referring to my grandmother below has the characteristics of > which of the following > > > > a) Phony > > b) Passive-aggressive > > c) Platitude puking > > d) Pitta-putrefied > > e) Paranoid > > d) My heart says (a) but it's probably (b) > > g) My intuition says (b) but it's probably (d) > > h) My gut says (e) but it's probably (a) > > i) Feste may say sweet but it's (a) > > j) Steve may say Kali but it's (b) > > h) Any of the above > > k) All of the above > > > > Remember there's no right or wrong answer and there's good and bad in > you and imagine this process to be a kind of a spring cleaning for your > chakras which even the likes of John Newton may approve. > > > > Love, > > Ravi > > > > On Apr 25, 2013, at 4:54 AM, Share Long sharelong60@... wrote: > > > > > dear Ravi, even before I read this tale of grandsons illustrious and > otherwise, I was remembering that sweet sweet photo of you with your > Grandmother. See how in tune we are?! Anyway, IMHO what's in that photo is > what's really important in life. > > > love, > > > Share > > > > > > From: Ravi Chivukula chivukula.ravi@... > > > > To: "FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com" FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com > > > Sent: Thursday, April 25, 2013 2:59 AM > > > Subject: Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: to azgrey was what a Sunday on FFL > > > > > > > > > Dear Share, > > > > > > A sincere apology entails honesty, accountability and integrity and > you show none of these qualities - all we see is this bait and switch of an > impending apology while you continue along your phony, passive-aggressive, > platitude-filled posts. > > > > > > You continue this week after week, this bait and switch strategy and I > can clearly see this. > > > > > > Year 2043 - you are in ICU, you can't talk but due to the advances > made after the hugely popular book of Dr. Curtis M - "NDE's - the > perspective of the Epistemological Purity of Neuroscience" - my grandson > who is your attending neurosurgeon, and the only Neurosurgeon to be > enlightened, analyzes your brain scans which Steve's grandson converts as > posts to FFL. > > > > > > You are already wildly popular as the leading subject of Dr. Curtis > M's book, the only person in history who slips into NDE every week. Robin's > not alive but his brain scans show he had an ADE(After Death Experience) > and is in heaven chilling with Jesus forcing God to get an Internet > connection so he has access to Merriam Webster and a decent ability to keep > up with Robin. > > > > > > But my super intelligent, enlightened grandson doesn't break the news > of Robin's passing away considering your fragile state. > > > > > > Yet week after week your posts still reflect your willingness to > reconcile with Robin interspersed with your other phony, > passive-aggressive, platitude-filled posts. > > > > > > Feste and Steve are not around but your sweet-talking, damsel in > distress routine means there are no dearth of shameless, brainless, > clueless idiots who are ensnared into defending you at all costs - why, > Steve's grandson is one of them, continuing in the illustrious footsteps of > his grandfather. > > > > > > > > > > > > On Wed, Apr 24, 2013 at 8:23 PM, Share Long sharelong60@... wrote: > > > > > > Judy if it's not, as you say below, you with whom I need to make it > right, then why have you spent the last almost 8 months badgering me about > it?! I'm actually starting to think that you don't want me and Robin to > reconcile. In fact you said something to that effect just recently to > another poster. > > > > > > As for the records, if you want something expunged from them, then I > guess you need to speak to Rick and or Alex about it. But again, I actually > don't think that's what you really want either. No, I think what you really > want is an excuse to keep attacking me for some seriously neurotic reason > that exists only in the depths of your neglected psyche. > > > > > > I'm guessing that Robin has not asked you to be his spokesperson in > this matter. In that case, I have nothing further to say to you about it, > Ms. Becoming More Sanctimonious Every Nanosecond! > > > From: authfriend authfriend@... > > > > To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com > > > Sent: Wednesday, April 24, 2013 8:37 PM > > > Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: to azgrey was what a Sunday on FFL > > > > > > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "feste37" feste37@ wrote: > > > > > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "feste37" wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > You are sounding like a pompous, finger-wagging ass, authfriend. > > > > > > > > > > (Says feste pompously, wagging his finger. Gee, and just > > > > > yesterday I had melted down and was reduced to sputtering > > > > > Yiddish insults. Pretty quick recovery, wouldn't you say?) > > > > > > > > Indeed, an excellent recovery. Back to your normal self in > > > > no time. > > > > > > I never was *not* my normal self, feste, as hard as you > > > tried to make it appear so. > > > > > > > The thing is authfriend, I actually like you, but it makes > > > > me mad when you lay into Share the way you do. > > > > > > Obviously. (You can call me Judy, by the way.) > > > > > > > It seems unfair and disrespectful. Share enjoys FFL, and most > > > > people here appreciate her, > > > > > > I'd need to see a poll, but this isn't a voting issue. In > > > any case, I don't think many here really understand what's > > > involved. > > > > > > > so I wish you could stretch yourself and be a little bit > > > > nicer to her. Why should that be so hard? The incident > > > > that seems to bug you most took place so long ago, why > > > > not just forget it, let it go? > > > > > > Because it was a terrible, awful thing for her to say, a > > > *malevolent* thing for her to say, something that was > > > intended to do serious damage to a person who had done > > > and was continuing to do his damndest to rectify the > > > situation. It was based on Share's misunderstanding of > > > something entirely innocuous that he had said. She needs > > > to retract it and apologize to him, for the sake of her > > > own soul if nothing else. > > > > > > > You talk all the time about honesty and truth, but such > > > > things are not always as black and white as you would like > > > > us to believe. Our opinions about all kinds of things can > > > > change as we reflect on them and consider them. A person > > > > can react in a certain way at the time to some incident > > > > involving someone else, but later (days, weeks, even months), > > > > the incident might seem rather different to them than it did > > > > at first. So they start to recontextualize it, to think of > > > > it in a different light. This happens all the time in > > > > relationships. It doesn't mean the person is being dishonest. > > > > Indeed, sometimes it means that they are in fact being very > > > > honest -- to their changing feelings and understandings about > > > > what took place. > > > > > > Generally speaking, all this is true, but not always. I do > > > not believe that was the case here, for a number of reasons > > > that I've already explained *and documented* a number of > > > times that your apologia cannot account for. I don't think > > > Share can account for them either, and I strongly suspect > > > that's why she has refused to provide a straightforward > > > explanation--because if it were honest, it would reflect > > > very badly on her, and perhaps even worse on some others. > > > > > > > Share has tried in her own way to make it right with you, > > > > so why not take a step or two toward her? > > > > > > It isn't me she needs to make it right with. And the steps > > > she has taken have been designed to get me off her back > > > without revealing the real story. She has also refused to > > > retract the accusation she made against Robin. She says > > > only that she isn't making that accusation *now*--but the > > > original accusation is still on the record. It needs to be > > > explicitly taken *off* the record; it didn't even come > > > close to being true in the first place. > > > > > > This wasn't just a minor misstep, feste. This was > > > scandalous and entirely indefensible. I would suggest you > > > read over my posts to Share about it and her responses, > > > because I don't think you've retained the crucial details > > > from when you read them the first time (assuming you did). > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Reply via web post Reply to sender Reply to group Start a New Topic > Messages in this topic (53) > > > RECENT ACTIVITY: New Members 2 New Photos 1 > > > > >