Ravi, doggonnit, you are not as dumb as I thought.  Since you always,
pretty much post the same thing, it makes sense to cut and paste as you
have been doing.


--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Ravi Chivukula wrote:
>
> Please don't humiliate yourself with your frivolous, careless,
reactive
> posts - day in and day out. How shameless, clueless, brainless can you
be -
> is there a bottom that you can hit or is this a bottomless pit you are
in?
>
> Take another shot at it, take your time, there's no hurry, I will give
my
> complete attention to it, I promise.
>
> Come up with something that has a morsel of dignity and intelligence -
> anything - some creative insult, insight, irony. Please I beg you -
give me
> something Steve baby.
>
>
>
> On Thu, Apr 25, 2013 at 8:58 PM, seventhray27 steve.sundur@...wrote:
>
> > **
> >
> >
> > Ravi, you're in a league of your own with the reactive, frivolous,
stupid
> > posts. But I liked the lawyer bit. I wish you'd stay on that theme a
> > little more.
> >
> >
> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Ravi Chivukula wrote:
> > >
> > > Please don't humiliate yourself with your frivolous, careless,
reactive
> > > posts - day in and day out. How shameless, clueless, brainless can
you
> > be -
> > > is there a bottom that you can hit or is this a bottomless pit you
are
> > in?
> > >
> > > Take another shot at it, take your time, there's no hurry, I will
give my
> > > complete attention to it, I promise.
> > >
> > > Come up with something that has a morsel of dignity and
intelligence -
> > > anything - some creative insult, insight, irony. Please I beg you
- give
> > me
> > > something Steve baby.
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > On Thu, Apr 25, 2013 at 8:25 PM, seventhray27 steve.sundur@...:
> > >
> > > > **
> >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > You are vomiting Ravi. You might want to try the toilet. They
should
> > have
> > > > a nice one where you work. Or at least tomorrow, if it should
come up
> > > > again.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Ravi Chivukula wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > Sorry dear Share we all got distracted by your stalking err
searching
> > > > for Sal.
> > > > >
> > > > > Considering your disability I have made this real easy for
you.
> > Please
> > > > feel free to take the help of the idiots Feste and Steve.
> > > > >
> > > > > Your post referring to my grandmother below has the
characteristics
> > of
> > > > which of the following
> > > > >
> > > > > a) Phony
> > > > > b) Passive-aggressive
> > > > > c) Platitude puking
> > > > > d) Pitta-putrefied
> > > > > e) Paranoid
> > > > > d) My heart says (a) but it's probably (b)
> > > > > g) My intuition says (b) but it's probably (d)
> > > > > h) My gut says (e) but it's probably (a)
> > > > > i) Feste may say sweet but it's (a)
> > > > > j) Steve may say Kali but it's (b)
> > > > > h) Any of the above
> > > > > k) All of the above
> > > > >
> > > > > Remember there's no right or wrong answer and there's good and
bad in
> > > > you and imagine this process to be a kind of a spring cleaning
for your
> > > > chakras which even the likes of John Newton may approve.
> > > > >
> > > > > Love,
> > > > > Ravi
> > > > >
> > > > > On Apr 25, 2013, at 4:54 AM, Share Long sharelong60@ wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > > dear Ravi, even before I read this tale of grandsons
illustrious
> > and
> > > > otherwise, I was remembering that sweet sweet photo of you with
your
> > > > Grandmother. See how in tune we are?! Anyway, IMHO what's in
that
> > photo is
> > > > what's really important in life.
> > > > > > love,
> > > > > > Share
> > > > > >
> > > > > > From: Ravi Chivukula chivukula.ravi@
> > > >
> > > > > > To: "FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com"
FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
> > > > > > Sent: Thursday, April 25, 2013 2:59 AM
> > > > > > Subject: Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: to azgrey was what a Sunday
on FFL
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Dear Share,
> > > > > >
> > > > > > A sincere apology entails honesty, accountability and
integrity and
> > > > you show none of these qualities - all we see is this bait and
switch
> > of an
> > > > impending apology while you continue along your phony,
> > passive-aggressive,
> > > > platitude-filled posts.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > You continue this week after week, this bait and switch
strategy
> > and I
> > > > can clearly see this.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Year 2043 - you are in ICU, you can't talk but due to the
advances
> > > > made after the hugely popular book of Dr. Curtis M - "NDE's -
the
> > > > perspective of the Epistemological Purity of Neuroscience" - my
> > grandson
> > > > who is your attending neurosurgeon, and the only Neurosurgeon to
be
> > > > enlightened, analyzes your brain scans which Steve's grandson
converts
> > as
> > > > posts to FFL.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > You are already wildly popular as the leading subject of Dr.
Curtis
> > > > M's book, the only person in history who slips into NDE every
week.
> > Robin's
> > > > not alive but his brain scans show he had an ADE(After Death
> > Experience)
> > > > and is in heaven chilling with Jesus forcing God to get an
Internet
> > > > connection so he has access to Merriam Webster and a decent
ability to
> > keep
> > > > up with Robin.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > But my super intelligent, enlightened grandson doesn't break
the
> > news
> > > > of Robin's passing away considering your fragile state.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Yet week after week your posts still reflect your
willingness to
> > > > reconcile with Robin interspersed with your other phony,
> > > > passive-aggressive, platitude-filled posts.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Feste and Steve are not around but your sweet-talking,
damsel in
> > > > distress routine means there are no dearth of shameless,
brainless,
> > > > clueless idiots who are ensnared into defending you at all costs
- why,
> > > > Steve's grandson is one of them, continuing in the illustrious
> > footsteps of
> > > > his grandfather.
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > On Wed, Apr 24, 2013 at 8:23 PM, Share Long sharelong60@
wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Judy if it's not, as you say below, you with whom I need to
make it
> > > > right, then why have you spent the last almost 8 months
badgering me
> > about
> > > > it?! I'm actually starting to think that you don't want me and
Robin to
> > > > reconcile. In fact you said something to that effect just
recently to
> > > > another poster.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > As for the records, if you want something expunged from
them, then
> > I
> > > > guess you need to speak to Rick and or Alex about it. But again,
I
> > actually
> > > > don't think that's what you really want either. No, I think what
you
> > really
> > > > want is an excuse to keep attacking me for some seriously
neurotic
> > reason
> > > > that exists only in the depths of your neglected psyche.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > I'm guessing that Robin has not asked you to be his
spokesperson in
> > > > this matter. In that case, I have nothing further to say to you
about
> > it,
> > > > Ms. Becoming More Sanctimonious Every Nanosecond!
> > > > > > From: authfriend authfriend@
> > > >
> > > > > > To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
> > > > > > Sent: Wednesday, April 24, 2013 8:37 PM
> > > > > > Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: to azgrey was what a Sunday on
FFL
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "feste37" feste37@
wrote:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "feste37" wrote:
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > You are sounding like a pompous, finger-wagging ass,
> > authfriend.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > (Says feste pompously, wagging his finger. Gee, and just
> > > > > > > > yesterday I had melted down and was reduced to
sputtering
> > > > > > > > Yiddish insults. Pretty quick recovery, wouldn't you
say?)
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Indeed, an excellent recovery. Back to your normal self in
> > > > > > > no time.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > I never was *not* my normal self, feste, as hard as you
> > > > > > tried to make it appear so.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > The thing is authfriend, I actually like you, but it makes
> > > > > > > me mad when you lay into Share the way you do.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Obviously. (You can call me Judy, by the way.)
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > It seems unfair and disrespectful. Share enjoys FFL, and
most
> > > > > > > people here appreciate her,
> > > > > >
> > > > > > I'd need to see a poll, but this isn't a voting issue. In
> > > > > > any case, I don't think many here really understand what's
> > > > > > involved.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > so I wish you could stretch yourself and be a little bit
> > > > > > > nicer to her. Why should that be so hard? The incident
> > > > > > > that seems to bug you most took place so long ago, why
> > > > > > > not just forget it, let it go?
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Because it was a terrible, awful thing for her to say, a
> > > > > > *malevolent* thing for her to say, something that was
> > > > > > intended to do serious damage to a person who had done
> > > > > > and was continuing to do his damndest to rectify the
> > > > > > situation. It was based on Share's misunderstanding of
> > > > > > something entirely innocuous that he had said. She needs
> > > > > > to retract it and apologize to him, for the sake of her
> > > > > > own soul if nothing else.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > You talk all the time about honesty and truth, but such
> > > > > > > things are not always as black and white as you would like
> > > > > > > us to believe. Our opinions about all kinds of things can
> > > > > > > change as we reflect on them and consider them. A person
> > > > > > > can react in a certain way at the time to some incident
> > > > > > > involving someone else, but later (days, weeks, even
months),
> > > > > > > the incident might seem rather different to them than it
did
> > > > > > > at first. So they start to recontextualize it, to think of
> > > > > > > it in a different light. This happens all the time in
> > > > > > > relationships. It doesn't mean the person is being
dishonest.
> > > > > > > Indeed, sometimes it means that they are in fact being
very
> > > > > > > honest -- to their changing feelings and understandings
about
> > > > > > > what took place.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Generally speaking, all this is true, but not always. I do
> > > > > > not believe that was the case here, for a number of reasons
> > > > > > that I've already explained *and documented* a number of
> > > > > > times that your apologia cannot account for. I don't think
> > > > > > Share can account for them either, and I strongly suspect
> > > > > > that's why she has refused to provide a straightforward
> > > > > > explanation--because if it were honest, it would reflect
> > > > > > very badly on her, and perhaps even worse on some others.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > Share has tried in her own way to make it right with you,
> > > > > > > so why not take a step or two toward her?
> > > > > >
> > > > > > It isn't me she needs to make it right with. And the steps
> > > > > > she has taken have been designed to get me off her back
> > > > > > without revealing the real story. She has also refused to
> > > > > > retract the accusation she made against Robin. She says
> > > > > > only that she isn't making that accusation *now*--but the
> > > > > > original accusation is still on the record. It needs to be
> > > > > > explicitly taken *off* the record; it didn't even come
> > > > > > close to being true in the first place.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > This wasn't just a minor misstep, feste. This was
> > > > > > scandalous and entirely indefensible. I would suggest you
> > > > > > read over my posts to Share about it and her responses,
> > > > > > because I don't think you've retained the crucial details
> > > > > > from when you read them the first time (assuming you did).
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Reply via web post Reply to sender Reply to group Start a
New Topic
> > > > Messages in this topic (53)
> > > > > > RECENT ACTIVITY: New Members 2 New Photos 1
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> >
> >
>


Reply via email to