Dear Turqb, something is not entirely right or enough inclusive about these two options to match common and fair experience. Facts and logic do commonly also arrive at objective conclusions. I am pretty certain that even Xeno could agree with me in respectful mutuality on this to expand and improve your feelings about people this way to be more inclusive. Otherwise there is something that subjectively seems unfair about having just these two survey question. My feeling is that you are up to something possibily hateful and logic may well prove that subsequently in a more inclusive and objective way. Respectfully, -Buck
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, turquoiseb <no_reply@...> wrote: > > Choose your answer from the following choices: > > A. My statements about another poster's words, actions, > veracity, motivations, or state of mine are right, and > reflect reality. If the other poster disagrees, he/she is > wrong, and is probably lying, insane, or demonstrating > low character traits and malevolent intent towards me. > > B. My statements about another poster's words, actions, > veracity, motivations, or state of mind are my opinion, > based on my purely subjective analysis. If the other > poster disagrees, he/she merely has a different opinion. > > > Hint: One of these answers is sane. The other...not so much. >
