Maybe we should do the math to see if TM teachers even make minimum 
wage. :-D

On 04/30/2013 03:50 AM, Michael Jackson wrote:
> I worked it out one time in US dollars - came to one billion, one hundred 
> fourteen million and some change, but I might have calculated incorrectly - 
> either way Girish and the Srivastavas brothers are not hurting.
>
>
>
> ________________________________
>   From: salyavin808 <fintlewoodle...@mail.com>
> To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
> Sent: Tuesday, April 30, 2013 3:05 AM
> Subject: [FairfieldLife] A Tidy Sum!
>   
>
>
>    
>
>
> I was checking up on the *real* big story in TM just to see if there
> were any developments in the argument over Marshy's alleged 60,000
> crore fortune:
>
> http://indiatoday.intoday.in/story/maharishi-mahesh-yogi-rs-60000-crore-fortune/1/201925.html
>
> Turns out there isn't but I thought I would work out what 60,000 Crore
> actually was in proper money.
>
> 1 crore = 10,000,000 rupees.
>
> 1000 rupees = 12.9 British pounds.
>
> 1 crore = 112,885 British pounds.
>
> 60,000 crore  = 6,833,100,000 British pounds.
>
> This is a quite extraordinary amount of money and completely
> give the lie to Marshy's plea for a billion dollars to save the
> world. They already had it many times over! But still the call goes
> out to support the pundit programme. Still, my friends give money
> every month - thinking that the movement actually needs support.
>
> People I know working for the TMO *still* don't get paid a penny
> for their efforts, but more money is going to be needed to pay
> lawyers to get back the money people have already given.
>
> The rajas presumably know all this and have acquired Marshy's
> gift of compartmentalising the TMO so that one section (the mug punters) 
> think it's in a state of poverty and spend their lives working to donate and 
> keep it afloat. While the other section
> spends its time investing in land and managing the ever growing fortune.
>
> When I learned TM I was put on the "very keen" database which
> meant I got begging letters for every project the TMO claimed
> to be working on. But I decided not to give them anything until
> I knew a bit more about them - like where the money actually went.
>
> Now I know and feel happy that I was never a donor. What a rip-off.
> What a con. But I do almost admire a mind capable of pulling off
> such a stunt over so many decades.
>
> PS. This all assuming the Indian paper has its facts right. I've checked the 
> conversion rates and used two calculators to make
> sure of my figures and it looks like £7 billion. If my maths are completely 
> askew don't blame me, blame my maths teacher. She was
> rubbish, it wasn't me.
>
>
>   

Reply via email to