On 05/04/2013 02:41 PM, salyavin808 wrote: > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Bhairitu <noozguru@...> wrote: >> On 05/03/2013 11:52 PM, salyavin808 wrote: >>> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "John" <jr_esq@> wrote: >>>> A scientist explains in this short clip. >>>> >>>> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hm5L8z34sNg >>>> >>> I'm fairly sure that remote viewing isn't a science. If it was >>> it would work and the US government wouldn't have taken 10 years >>> to find Bin Laden, for instance. >>> >>> They probably wouldn't have abandoned their RV project when they realised >>> it didn't work either. >>> >>> So there wasn't any need to watch to another crap quantum bollocks >>> youtube video. If there is no signal there is no need to invent an >>> explanation for one. >> Supposedly they found Bin Laden and he was killed in the battle of Tora >> Bora but not enough remained to claim the kill. So they used him as a >> Bogey Man to keep Americans in fear making all kinds of money for the >> military industrial complex. Since he has worn out his welcome (IOW, >> the public was catching on) they staged a bogus assassination a couple >> years ago. > A well qualified supposedly.
At least as "qualified" as believing the mainstream media or government officials. It's anecdotal but from a variety of sources over the years. > > >> I have experienced the tantric kind of remote viewing and we also have >> other "remote" kinds of things such as maran, vashikaran, uchattan, >> stambhan and videshan. The military studied these things but probably >> that was a bad environment to get it right. > I will convert for evidence. Good luck. You'll have to find a teacher as mine isn't around anymore.
