--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, turquoiseb <no_reply@...> wrote: > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "salyavin808" <fintlewoodlewix@> wrote: > > > > Yep, a functioning brain is the seat of consciousness but > > groups like the TMO will attempt to weaken that idea for > > their own agenda. > > Exactly. While I appreciate your tenacity and infinite > patience in trying to have a rational conversation with > irrational people, I'll stay out of it. You're having > the discussion with religious fanatics who are not even > defending a position they came to on their own, but one > that was told to them by some guy wearing a white sheet, > who they chose to believe and onto whom they project > unwarranted wisdom.
Wow, Barry's wrong *again*. He hasn't actually read the posts, so he isn't aware there's a nonreligious case to be made for consciousness not being explainable on the basis of biology. But then, salyavin's been making the same mistake, and he *has* been reading the posts. Makes you wonder who the Fundamentalists are, don't it?
