On Thu, May 30, 2013 at 6:42 PM, Ravi Chivukula <chivukula.r...@gmail.com>wrote:
> > > > On Thu, May 30, 2013 at 5:53 AM, emptybill <emptyb...@yahoo.com> wrote: > >> ** >> >> >> It was a typo and should have been *parArtha/paraartha *rather than * >> paratha* - an type of Indian bread. >> > > Oh empty baby this really helps me. I have always had trouble explaining > the feeling I have every time I read your posts. > > "Paratha" pretty much nails it - an overstuffed, overcooked Paratha that > is your fucking head. Thanks empty - you are indeed a very perceptive, > compassionate man. > Sorry empty baby - so just not a simple Aloo Paratha OK? It's a paratha will all kinds of vegetables cooked and mashed together - and that is just the perfect analogy for your fucking head. > > >> >> Sva-artha/Swa-artha is *that which **exists for* or *is for *"one's own". >> Para-artha is that which *exists for* or *is for* an "other". >> >> According to Patanjali, the purpose (artha) of prakriti is to give >> experience (bhoga) and freedom (moksha) to purusha. >> Having give both, prakriti (the procreatrix) then retires from her dance >> - having been "enjoyed". >> >> Therefore the sanyama is on whatever serves our purpose us versus our own >> inherent meaning/purpose/value. >> >> >> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Share Long wrote: >> > >> > emptybill, not to dredge up more gomaya but can you explain what you >> say below about experience? I read YS 3.25 and googled both svartha and >> paratha, only getting a definition for the latter, unleavened bread. >> Thanks >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > ________________________________ >> > From: emptybill emptybill@... >> > To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com >> > Sent: Monday, May 27, 2013 12:29 PM >> > Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: BrahmÂtman >> > >> > >> > >> >  >> > Got it? >> > >> > "Snake" is the experience but "stick" is the actual basis of the >> > appearance. >> > Individuality is the apparent experience but the Vast Expanse is the >> > basis. >> > >> > Experience is an idea founded upon indistinction between svArtha versus >> > parAtha. >> > ys 3.25 >> > >> > Got BrahmÂtman? >> > >> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "card" wrote: >> > > >> > > >> > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "emptybill" wrote: >> > > > >> > > > >> > > > brahma satyam jagan mithya jivo brahmaiva na parah >> > > > >> > > > brahman is real - the world an appearance- the individual is brahman >> > > > indeed - not other >> > > > >> > > > … Vivekachudamani of Shankara >> > > > Got brahm? >> > > > >> > > >> > > Huh!? [:-/] >> > > >> > >> >> > >
