> 
> > > Could it be illegal and a sin against TM Dome meditation policy 
> > > guidelines to host TM'ers known to have visited Saints?  Aiding or 
> > > abetting these meditators by giving them shelter?  
> > > 
> > 
> > The Prime Minister has not rescinded his Anti-Saint Dome meditation policy 
> > yet.
> >

What?  Families caught hosting fugitive TM meditators who went to visit saints 
will be punished by the Dome Course Office? By Bevan?  

> 
> Yep, harboring fugitives from the TM movement.  It should cost a host family 
> to lose their own Dome badges for helping these fugitives from the TM 
> movement get in to the Domes to meditate.  
>  
> > >
> > > 
> > > >
> > > > A "Host Program" has been inspired by the current situation with the 
> > > > IAA Settle Grant. We hope to facilitate connecting current IAA 
> > > > participants with a Host during this transitional time and to inspire a 
> > > > new generation of IAA participants to be able to attend for either 
> > > > short (month long) or longer terms. 
> > > > 
> > > > A "match up" description for any Sidha who has a room in their home 
> > > > that would be available for at least one month will be created.
> > > > 
> > > 
> > > Could it be illegal and a sin against TM Dome meditation policy 
> > > guidelines to host TM'ers known to have visited Saints?  Aiding or 
> > > abetting these meditators by giving them shelter?  
> > >  
> > > > >
> > > > > Susan you would think so, this would be reasonable for the people who 
> > > > > have already been taught the sidhis technique.  But no.  A stunning 
> > > > > moment in the meeting was their announcement there would be 
> > > > > re-fresher meetings about practicing the technique but in the same 
> > > > > breath you'd need a Dome badge first to go to the meetings.  
> > > > > Catch-22. 
> > > > > See:
> > > > >  
> > > > > http://applicantqv.blogspot.com/2012/03/yogic-flying-tm-banned-from-domes.html
> > > > >  
> > > > > 
> > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Susan" <wayback71@> wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Here's an idea, an experiment:  Have a 4 week period where anyone 
> > > > > > who ever got the siddhis can come and fly in the Domes. The TMO 
> > > > > > could give out special colored badges in advance.  No background 
> > > > > > checks or eliminating a person because they saw another saint etc.  
> > > > > > Just anyone can come, everyone very welcome, fly in to town for 
> > > > > > this, if need be.  A really welcoming, genuine atmosphere.
> > > > > > 
> > > > > >  Then, see how it goes for those 4 weeks - Maybe things would 
> > > > > > improve in some way:  more people would attend, the energy in the 
> > > > > > Domes would be more powerful.  Even maybe it would inspire those 
> > > > > > attending to come regularly again.  And Maybe the TMO would see it 
> > > > > > was all so wonderful and created such goodwill that they would drop 
> > > > > > the restrictions in the future.  It would be an experiment.  And it 
> > > > > > is a way to see, really, if there are "enough" people around still 
> > > > > > wanting to do program in the Domes in Fairfield, Iowa.  Heck, even 
> > > > > > Rick would be admitted.  At the least, it would be a fun social 
> > > > > > time, and at best a real motivator for people to do program in the 
> > > > > > Domes.  I like to think that MMY himself would go for this. 
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Buck" <dhamiltony2k5@> wrote:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Son, you were not here so don't just assume things but yes your 
> > > > > > > advice below is good and true about the fourth estate below.  
> > > > > > > That is also how things get done around here.  Obviously they 
> > > > > > > read this page and others about themselves and can move in ways 
> > > > > > > accordingly.  The meeting was a TM movement style public meeting 
> > > > > > > where they control the stage seats and microphones in their way 
> > > > > > > of decorum. Very top-down with the authority up front in the 
> > > > > > > stuffed chairs with the mics.  We're an extremely verbal group, 
> > > > > > > but.  When the mics were opened up a bunch of people lined up for 
> > > > > > > the floor mics and the line got worked through.  Mostly sincere 
> > > > > > > people and some aggravated people too get up thinking to solve 
> > > > > > > the problem in little ways.  A couple good new ideas come but 
> > > > > > > nothing of fundamental change offered.  Not many people from in 
> > > > > > > the town.  Mostly concerned earnest faith-based kind of movement 
> > > > > > > people who are not really going to jeopardize their access to 
> > > > > > > everything by speaking out much truth to power.  Though as soon 
> > > > > > > as the meeting is over folks are talking to one another about 
> > > > > > > real things.  The enforced steady decorum of the moderated mic 
> > > > > > > was not really about discussion.  Just quick consideration of one 
> > > > > > > point per and the point would be referred to further 
> > > > > > > consideration in some groups.  Mayor Malloy as a meditator did do 
> > > > > > > an excellent job of moderating the usual community crazies too 
> > > > > > > who get up to any open mics in any public meeting.  After a while 
> > > > > > > they announced the last comment as the mic went to a guy that it 
> > > > > > > was getting late and the meeting was to end.  So it went.  
> > > > > > > Nothing really substantial related to our community deficit in 
> > > > > > > the Dome numbers and who was responsible.
> > > > > > > -Buck
> > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, turquoiseb <no_reply@> 
> > > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, turquoiseb <no_reply@> 
> > > > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Buck" <dhamiltony2k5@> 
> > > > > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > Actually there was only one person tonite at the landmark 
> > > > > > > > > > meeting who brushed up against this talking about how 
> > > > > > > > > > experiences have been compromised in people because of 
> > > > > > > > > > an underlying problem. She spoke in code of course with 
> > > > > > > > > > the big guy up there in front of the room. Otherwise the 
> > > > > > > > > > suggestions were trivial, as if people did not know the 
> > > > > > > > > > antipathy old meditators have with the movement with the 
> > > > > > > > > > elephant sitting in the room. Two elephants actually.
> > > > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > > > Buck, I'm going to have to call you on this one. 
> > > > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > > > If YOU were there, why didn't YOU speak up?
> > > > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > > > The problems with the "dome program" are NOT because
> > > > > > > > > of the people administrating them. They're caused by
> > > > > > > > > the roomful of pussies to timid or too intimidated
> > > > > > > > > to say something about the policies. 
> > > > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > > > Don't you DARE keep ranting about Bevan and his gang
> > > > > > > > > if YOU didn't have the balls to say something when
> > > > > > > > > offered the opportunity to do so.
> > > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > > I'm mentioning this partly because of the chorus of
> > > > > > > > laudations for the late LB Shriver. I never knew him,
> > > > > > > > and his contributions to FFL were before my time. But
> > > > > > > > I've noticed a tendency in some people checking in 
> > > > > > > > here to admire him for standing up to the "powers that 
> > > > > > > > be" and actually making some of his comments and 
> > > > > > > > criticisms in public.
> > > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > > Which is admirable, except that the people applauding
> > > > > > > > him for doing this don't seem to do this themselves. 
> > > > > > > > They bend over and take in the ass from the TMO 
> > > > > > > > policies, then grumble safely from behind pseudonyms 
> > > > > > > > about the perps not having used any K-Y, if they
> > > > > > > > grumble at all. 
> > > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > > NOTHING will change about the TM movement until this
> > > > > > > > codependent enabling stops. I've said it before and 
> > > > > > > > I'll probably say it again -- if you want a change to 
> > > > > > > > these discriminatory and probably illegal policies, 
> > > > > > > > TAKE IT TO THE PRESS. Go public, and go large. 
> > > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > > Nothing terrifies tyrants more than the things they're
> > > > > > > > doing behind closed doors being made public. Nothing
> > > > > > > > encourages them more to *continue* doing these things 
> > > > > > > > than a bunch of terrified sheep too timid to complain 
> > > > > > > > that the shepherds are buggering them.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
>

Reply via email to