You want to buy you a Fairfield home or a farm or just rent a place, that can't deal nobody harm, Or take your vacation out by the mountains or sea. But don't swap your old cow for a car, you better stay right where you are, Better take this little tip from me. 'Cause I look through the want ads every day But the headlines on the papers always say: If you ain't got the do re mi, siddhas, you ain't got the do re mi, Why, you better go back to beautiful Texas, Oklahoma, Kansas, Georgia, Tennessee.
> > > > > Fairfield is a garden of Eden, a paradise to live in or see; > > But believe it or not, you won't find it so hot > > If you ain't got the do re mi. > > > > If you ain't got the do re mi, siddhas, you ain't got the do re mi, > Why, you better go back to beautiful Texas, Oklahoma, Kansas, Georgia, > Tennessee. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Look, Bevan's anti-saint axiom on this is that meditators who go to > > > see saints may confuse other people who are seeing them thus about the > > > sufficiency and effectiveness of TM altogether. This is matter of > > > faith. And II, that these meditators should be hunt down as fugitives > > > and punished also as a matter of faith by removal or refusal of Dome > > > meditation badges. Of course a long problem with Bevan's axiom is that > > > most of the meditating community does not believe it or take it as a > > > matter of faith. That leaves Bevan and a few people around him by > > > themselves as the inner movement. Hence the TM anti-saint faithful > > > inside vs. the practitioner meditator movement. It's a bad civil war > > > about faith in axiom. > > > > > > > > > > Visiting Saints and Runaway Meditators > > > > > > > > > > > > By Guideline > > > > > > > > > > > > It is Illegal to: > > > > > > > > > > > > Willingly obstruct, hinder, or prevent from arrest fugitives from the > > > meditation group. > > > > > > > > > > > > It is Illegal to: > > > > > > > > > > > > Rescue, or attempt to rescue, fugitives from the Dome meditation for > > > having visited or sat with saints, holy mahatmas, or wise people , from > > > the custody of such claim as this course office may have. > > > > > > > > > > > > It is Illegal to: > > > > > > > > > > > > Aid, abet, or assist such persons so owing service or labor of > > > meditation, directly or indirectly, to escape from such claim. > > > > > > > > > > > > It is Illegal to: > > > > > > > > > > > > Harbor or conceal meditator fugitives from service or meditation, so as > > > to prevent the discovery and arrest of such persons, after notice or > > > knowledge of the fact that such persons are fugitive from service or > > > meditation. > > > > > > Penalty of Law: > > > > > > For either of said criminal offences, offenders shall be subject to > > > administrative review and the loss of Dome meditation privileges by > > > indictment and conviction > > > > > > and pay, by way of civil damages to the parties injured by such illegal > > > conduct, the sum of one thousand dollars for each fugitive from > > > meditation so lost to be recovered by action of debt. > > > > > > "Let us put a stop to meditator stealing by other saints!" > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Could it be illegal and a sin against TM Dome meditation > > > policy guidelines to host TM'ers known to have visited Saints? Aiding > > > or abetting these meditators by giving them shelter? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > The Prime Minister has not rescinded his Anti-Saint Dome > > > meditation policy yet. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > What? Families caught hosting fugitive TM meditators who went to > > > visit saints will be punished by the Dome Course Office? By Bevan? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Yep, harboring fugitives from the TM movement. It should cost a > > > host family to lose their own Dome badges for helping these fugitives > > > from the TM movement get in to the Domes to meditate. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > A "Host Program" has been inspired by the current situation > > > with the IAA Settle Grant. We hope to facilitate connecting current IAA > > > participants with a Host during this transitional time and to inspire a > > > new generation of IAA participants to be able to attend for either short > > > (month long) or longer terms. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > A "match up" description for any Sidha who has a room in > > > their home that would be available for at least one month will be > > > created. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Could it be illegal and a sin against TM Dome meditation > > > policy guidelines to host TM'ers known to have visited Saints? Aiding > > > or abetting these meditators by giving them shelter? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Susan you would think so, this would be reasonable for the > > > people who have already been taught the sidhis technique. But no. A > > > stunning moment in the meeting was their announcement there would be > > > re-fresher meetings about practicing the technique but in the same > > > breath you'd need a Dome badge first to go to the meetings. Catch-22. > > > > > > > > > > See: > > > > > > > > > > > > > http://applicantqv.blogspot.com/2012/03/yogic-flying-tm-banned-from-dome\ > > > s.html > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Susan" wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Here's an idea, an experiment: Have a 4 week period > > > where anyone who ever got the siddhis can come and fly in the Domes. The > > > TMO could give out special colored badges in advance. No background > > > checks or eliminating a person because they saw another saint etc. Just > > > anyone can come, everyone very welcome, fly in to town for this, if need > > > be. A really welcoming, genuine atmosphere. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Then, see how it goes for those 4 weeks - Maybe things > > > would improve in some way: more people would attend, the energy in the > > > Domes would be more powerful. Even maybe it would inspire those > > > attending to come regularly again. And Maybe the TMO would see it was > > > all so wonderful and created such goodwill that they would drop the > > > restrictions in the future. It would be an experiment. And it is a way > > > to see, really, if there are "enough" people around still wanting to do > > > program in the Domes in Fairfield, Iowa. Heck, even Rick would be > > > admitted. At the least, it would be a fun social time, and at best a > > > real motivator for people to do program in the Domes. I like to think > > > that MMY himself would go for this. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Buck" wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Son, you were not here so don't just assume things but > > > yes your advice below is good and true about the fourth estate below. > > > That is also how things get done around here. Obviously they read this > > > page and others about themselves and can move in ways accordingly. The > > > meeting was a TM movement style public meeting where they control the > > > stage seats and microphones in their way of decorum. Very top-down with > > > the authority up front in the stuffed chairs with the mics. We're an > > > extremely verbal group, but. When the mics were opened up a bunch of > > > people lined up for the floor mics and the line got worked through. > > > Mostly sincere people and some aggravated people too get up thinking to > > > solve the problem in little ways. A couple good new ideas come but > > > nothing of fundamental change offered. Not many people from in the > > > town. Mostly concerned earnest faith-based kind of movement people who > > > are not really going to jeopardize their access to everything by > > > speaking out much truth to power. Though as soon as the meeting is over > > > folks are talking to one another about real things. The enforced steady > > > decorum of the moderated mic was not really about discussion. Just > > > quick consideration of one point per and the point would be referred to > > > further consideration in some groups. Mayor Malloy as a meditator did > > > do an excellent job of moderating the usual community crazies too who > > > get up to any open mics in any public meeting. After a while they > > > announced the last comment as the mic went to a guy that it was getting > > > late and the meeting was to end. So it went. Nothing really > > > substantial related to our community deficit in the Dome numbers and who > > > was responsible. > > > > > > > > > > > > -Buck > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, turquoiseb > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, turquoiseb > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Buck" > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Actually there was only one person tonite at the > > > landmark > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > meeting who brushed up against this talking > > > about how > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > experiences have been compromised in people > > > because of > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > an underlying problem. She spoke in code of > > > course with > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > the big guy up there in front of the room. > > > Otherwise the > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > suggestions were trivial, as if people did not > > > know the > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > antipathy old meditators have with the movement > > > with the > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > elephant sitting in the room. Two elephants > > > actually. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Buck, I'm going to have to call you on this one. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > If YOU were there, why didn't YOU speak up? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > The problems with the "dome program" are NOT > > > because > > > > > > > > > > > > > > of the people administrating them. They're caused > > > by > > > > > > > > > > > > > > the roomful of pussies too timid or too > > > intimidated > > > > > > > > > > > > > > to say something about the policies. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Don't you DARE keep ranting about Bevan and his > > > gang > > > > > > > > > > > > > > if YOU didn't have the balls to say something when > > > > > > > > > > > > > > offered the opportunity to do so. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I'm mentioning this partly because of the chorus of > > > > > > > > > > > > > laudations for the late LB Shriver. I never knew > > > him, > > > > > > > > > > > > > and his contributions to FFL were before my time. > > > But > > > > > > > > > > > > > I've noticed a tendency in some people checking in > > > > > > > > > > > > > here to admire him for standing up to the "powers > > > that > > > > > > > > > > > > > be" and actually making some of his comments and > > > > > > > > > > > > > criticisms in public. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Which is admirable, except that the people > > > applauding > > > > > > > > > > > > > him for doing this don't seem to do this themselves. > > > > > > > > > > > > > They bend over and take in the ass from the TMO > > > > > > > > > > > > > policies, then grumble safely from behind pseudonyms > > > > > > > > > > > > > about the perps not having used any K-Y, if they > > > > > > > > > > > > > grumble at all. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > NOTHING will change about the TM movement until this > > > > > > > > > > > > > codependent enabling stops. I've said it before and > > > > > > > > > > > > > I'll probably say it again -- if you want a change > > > to > > > > > > > > > > > > > these discriminatory and probably illegal policies, > > > > > > > > > > > > > TAKE IT TO THE PRESS. Go public, and go large. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Nothing terrifies tyrants more than the things > > > they're > > > > > > > > > > > > > doing behind closed doors being made public. Nothing > > > > > > > > > > > > > encourages them more to *continue* doing these > > > things > > > > > > > > > > > > > than a bunch of terrified sheep too timid to > > > complain > > > > > > > > > > > > > that the shepherds are buggering them. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
