Yes, I do - the best. But I fear part of the issue, vee are seeink, with the patient, Barry, is that any boil, bodily discomfort, carbuncle, bad cuppa coffee, digestive upset, impotence, scar, bed wetting, life struggle, or slash, is automatically ascribed to the external, "TM AND MAHARISHI OR HIS FOLLOWERS". It is unfortunately a mental issue, that no amount of surgery, plastic or otherwise, will cure.
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Ann" <awoelflebater@...> wrote: > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, doctordumbass@ <no_reply@> wrote: > > > > Yes, you bucked the trend, hung out with Freddie Lenz, and look how much > > more emotionally and spiritually evolved you are, than the rest of us. > > Nailed It - LOL. > > Hey, Herr Doktoorr, do you think these old TM wounds are open festering > sores, livid scars or just a scab that won't heal on some here? Sometimes > scars can be badges of courage but here they appear rather disfiguring. Do > you know of a good plastic surgeon? > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, turquoiseb <no_reply@> wrote: > > > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "emptybill" <emptybill@> wrote: > > > > > > > > The reality outside of the incestuous guru-groupie ashrams of > > > > US/Europe/pseudo-India is far from the reality. MMY's edicts to > > > > prevent his psychophants from "contamination" by other truths > > > > was a control move to guarantee kowtowing fidelity. > > > > > > I like "psychophants." :-) And while I may disagree with > > > your use of the word "truths" to describe that which they > > > might have found by meeting other teachers, I completely > > > agree that it was Maharishi who tried desperately to keep > > > them from ever meeting them. From Day One of meeting him > > > he put down other teachers and traditions, and created > > > a sense of "sin" or "wrongdoing" in anyone who wanted > > > *to* meet them. It was *very* much the same vibe as > > > women who go berserk if their boyfriend or husband even > > > *looks* at another woman -- jealousy. > > > > > > Maharishi wanted "spiritual virgins" who had no one else > > > to compare him with. And with reason. > > > > > > > For years, people traveling to India could (and did) explore other > > > > practices. In India it was even recommended by other gurus so that > > > > their followers could get a bearing on the ideas and praxis that > > > > were significant to their sampradaya. > > > > > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Susan" wrote: > > > > > > > > > > Nabby, the truth is that the no saint policy came directly from MMY. > > > > It was his very own and clear directive all along. It may be that a > > > > decision will be made to loosen up on that policy. But as far as I know, > > > > the entire movement is functioning under that same rule. Anything > > > > otherwise is considered OTP, altho no one in other countries may know > > > > about other saints or care so much as in the US. > > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, nablusoss1008 no_reply@ wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Buck" wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > The Prime Minister in this problem with the saints has created the > > > > movement culture of an underground of meditators. He makes it very > > > > difficult for there to be success in the ME of meditation. > > > > > > > > > > > > Buck, are you on Facebook ? Seek out Anamay Ashram, all Vedic, run > > > > by Governors. They just had a visit from a Saint. Very cosy and private. > > > > He was very pleased with the progress there and gave his blessings. > > > > > > > > > > > > You must understand that the no-saint-policy is stritcly an american > > > > policy and is hardly observed anywhere else, if at all. Just go with the > > > > flow or emigrate. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
