>From an Amazon review of an old book called TM and Cult Mania:

The basic claim of TM is that sitting quietly, with eyes closed, and 
repeating a secret mantra will make the practitioner "one with the 
Universe." This is the aim of all Eastern meditation, but in the 
Maharishi's case, additional claims of health benefits (lowered blood 
pressure, increased productivity and concentration, reduced stress) were 
supposedly backed up by scientific proofs. Persinger, a neuro-scientist 
to the core, dismantles those proofs with stunning detail, including a 
fascinating one-page explanation of how statistics in scientific studies can be 
made to lie. These sorts of shenanigans outrage Persinger.

On
 page 124 he states: "Words like 'experiments' or 'data analysis' become
 meaningless when they are intended only to legitimize assumptions 
already held. Within this context, controls do not have to be 
instituted, checks for experimental artifacts are not required, and 
actual faking of the data becomes 'acceptable for the cause'... Science 
as a sales technique is a sham." Although the subversion of science 
really gets his goat, it is the blatant manipulation of people through 
preying on their anxieties that puts Persinger's panties in a twist.

Neurotics,
 a group that Persinger defines as people who "worry more than work, 
plan more than participate, and cower more than confront," are paralyzed
 by anxiety. These are the people who flock to TM in an effort to sort 
out their lives. The sweet promise of relief from perpetual anxiety 
blinds them to the manipulation of the TM movement. This, Persinger 
considers to be the ultimate crime. He points out, and with good cause, 
that "TM's final legacy will not be found in its promises but in its 
techniques. These same principles of human persuasion have been used by 
vast political machines and giant religious conglomeration to conquer 
peoples. Intoxicated by the wonder words from charismatic leaders, 
millions have found internal peace and meaning to life, but frequently 
at the expense of others."

Reply via email to